Flaming on the Increase?

Your comments about/towards Capt_Fantastic in the thread you made about derogatory terms for homosexual men.

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
I can think of loads of offensive terms for homosexual men, why are their so many?

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
Particularly the involvemetn of faeces around the sexual organs.

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
Rectal Ranger is for instance an American term

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
my faeces only end up in the pan. 🙂 Can you say the same 🙂

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
so what your saying is you "play" with others faeces.

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
I think i'm putting it in the right hole i see no faeces when I pull it out 🙂

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Your comments about/towards Capt_Fantastic in the thread you made about derogatory terms for homosexual men.

your taking these out of context X but thats cool

Yes its funny to see that whirly.......in the end its only out of context when it doesn't help us.....

Words are tools and used in any way possible..........

Anyway I understood your point whirly I am just making that comment for my own benefit🙂

Originally posted by soleran30
Yes its funny to see that whirly.......in the end its only out of context when it doesn't help us.....

Words are tools and used in any way possible..........

Anyway I understood your point whirly I am just making that comment for my own benefit🙂

Actually they aren't really taken out of context. The first three are you encouraging people to discuss derogatory terms for gays, the third is accompanied by the leading question "Can this be funny?". The last three were in exchanges between you and Capt_Fantastic. But regardless, insulting phrases used with insulting intent are justified by context? I suppose anyone can justify the things that they do. Huh? Do elaborate for me then.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Actually they aren't really taken out of context. The first three are you encouraging people to discuss derogatory terms for gays, the third is accompanied by the leading question "Can this be funny?". The last three were in exchanges between you and Capt_Fantastic. But regardless, insulting phrases used with insulting intent are justified by context? I suppose anyone can justify the things that they do. Huh? Do elaborate for me then.

Thats your interpretation 🙂

Whatever lets you justify your actions whirly. Have a nice day. 🙂

Word to yo motha Whirly4............Ayup

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Whatever lets you justify your actions whirly. Have a nice day. 🙂

Thanks I will 🙂 tsk flamers ❌

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
Thats your interpretation 🙂

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Which is what an insult is, I am sarcastic and people get offended, I may have not meant harm, but I am still "wrong".

You C ❌ never 🙂

Never wrong, or never insulting?

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Never wrong, or never insulting?

😖hifty: you decide

Never wrong suits me more...

😖hifty:

Originally posted by Tha C-Master
Never wrong suits me more...

😖hifty:

OK thats what it means 😕 😖hifty:

Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
Thats your interpretation 🙂

Ultimately that's where a bit of social diplomacy and tact come into it. Why? Because it is virtually impossible that others will have the same views and see things in the same light as you do. The relativity of thought and all that. People WILL interpret it, as this is how we learn, by interpreting the information given. The quotes in question do appear to be insulting, and I can see why people could be offended, as even if they were in some other context the wording make them unfriendly to say the least.

This might not have been your intention, but the presentation still has such an effect. Therefore it can be good to consider one's words, phrasing and tone, even if it is only to try and insure your views get across without seeming insulting or as flames etc. Tact is one of the most useful things in conversing, and it doesn't mean that one can't say what they think, just that it's a good thing to be considerate and respectful to the people you are debating with.

Originally posted by Imperial_Samura
Ultimately that's where a bit of social diplomacy and tact come into it. Why? Because it is virtually impossible that others will have the same views and see things in the same light as you do. The relativity of thought and all that. People WILL interpret it, as this is how we learn, by interpreting the information given. The quotes in question do appear to be insulting, and I can see why people could be offended, as even if they were in some other context the wording make them unfriendly to say the least.

This might not have been your intention, but the presentation still has such an effect. Therefore it can be good to consider one's words, phrasing and tone, even if it is only to try and insure your views get across without seeming insulting or as flames etc. Tact is one of the most useful things in conversing, and it doesn't mean that one can't say what they think, just that it's a good thing to be considerate and respectful to the people you are debating with.

Your right it often can be 😖hifty:

Originally posted by Spelljammer
I've got nothing to hide, I am Big Evil. Though I wouldn't call it a sock more like a "reincarnation". I was banned because I was as it said "generaly hostile and rude to other members". But sense I stopped purposely picking fights with people and making stupid mom jokes, I've had no reason to be banned again. They've admitted to this descision before..

Infact, I've considered doing a fiction of SpellJammer versus Big Evil. 😂

Da mystery has been solved! 😱

Originally posted by Inspectah Deck
Da mystery has been solved! 😱

yes he is not a sock - he is big evil

Originally posted by whobdamandog
I don't know why people take things so seriously on these chat boards. I actually find it quite amusing when a little flame war comes up from time to time...

Some of my best flames have taken part in the GDF. Usually regarding the evolution, psychology, and legal matters..

But excluding myself...let's not forget the multiple other flamers who contribute some excitement to this board...Whirlyspatt..(Mr let me open up 5 different threads to get my point across.bwahhahaha...)

Or how about Mr Alpha Centurai..("allude" vs "illude...lol..funny stuff)

Or Kidrock...(the original one line retort man..sad thing is..he don't have much to say after that...)

Bravo gentleman..it's okay to be a troll..embrace who you are...I already have..😆😆

You mean your a troll Whob? 😖hifty:

😆