Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
why are you doing this whirly? this is OTT now...Seems to me your trying to twist what people are saying to justify your own ignorance...
Show me who justified the holocaust...
last one was that guy with horus in his sig who said basically what right did I say to tell people it was evil.
British and American Napalm on Dresden a city filled with innocent people.. That happened to have a factory
Thats the germans there cleaning up the body's of their friends and family's that were burned to the ground. Many cruel things were done in the war. But nothing except for the A-Bomb was doubted as much as the decision to burn an entire city to the ground. Everybody knew full well what it would do, still it was done.
Want to talk about crap like that too? Want to talk about how English generals knowingly damned thousands of german citizens to death by burning? Want to talk about all the other things England did that were wrong in that war or any other?
Its over man, this is what Thread number 3 or 4 about this subject. DOn't you have anything better to do then look at how bad Germany is.. For crying out load.
Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
yup exactly you twisted his words to say that he was justifying the holocaust.... Whirly this is far enough now... You know thats not what he meant.
I know its not whats meant - but some things should never be said - Genocide is evil and unjusifiable - I obviously bear no malice towards modern Germany as long as they do not forget the lessons to be learnt from history anymore than we do.
Germany signed up to the UN agreement on Genocide as did the UK and Netherlands in 1998 the US did not.
-end
Originally posted by Fishy
British and American Napalm on Dresden a city filled with innocent people.. That happened to have a factoryThats the germans there cleaning up the body's of their friends and family's that were burned to the ground. Many cruel things were done in the war. But nothing except for the A-Bomb was doubted as much as the decision to burn an entire city to the ground. Everybody knew full well what it would do, still it was done.
Want to talk about crap like that too? Want to talk about how English generals knowingly damned thousands of german citizens to death by burning? Want to talk about all the other things England did that were wrong in that war or any other?
Its over man, this is what Thread number 3 or 4 about this subject. DOn't you have anything better to do then look at how bad Germany is.. For crying out load.
In response to Coventry and the London Blitz, my cousins grandparents died in that.
No... England bombed city's in response for that. They burned people without any good reason. Burning this city was done for one reason and one reason only. Destroying one single factory and killing innocent civilians. I thought England was the better party in the war, not evil. Unlike Nazi Germany. Burning thousands of people on purpose seems a very cruel thing to do.
And mind you, the cruellest known thing in the war up until that moment. They wanted to screw with Germany harder then Germany had with them. They burned thousands of people. I do not see any difference. Bombing is bad enough but doing something like this, its just damn cruel. So was the Holocaust, but are people still blaming England for that?
Originally posted by Fishy
No... England bombed city's in response for that. They burned people without any good reason. Burning this city was done for one reason and one reason only. Destroying one single factory and killing innocent civilians. I thought England was the better party in the war, not evil. Unlike Nazi Germany. Burning thousands of people on purpose seems a very cruel thing to do.And mind you, the cruellest known thing in the war up until that moment. They wanted to screw with Germany harder then Germany had with them. They burned thousands of people. I do not see any difference. Bombing is bad enough but doing something like this, its just damn cruel.
It was a cruel thing to do - Would you rather the Allies had lost so this could continue.
Originally posted by Whirlysplatt
It was a cruel thing to do - Would you rather the Allies had lost so this could continue.
Destroying that city or not would not have cost them victory..
3 weeks later it was already working at 80% of its capability, all it did was kill people. And everybody knew that, thats all it would do. It was an active decision to kill civilians. Look if you want to remember the evil one side did at least be fair and remember all the evil done.