Mark Hamill or Hayden Christensen?
In terms of acting ability, who do you think is better?
I'd say Cristensen, he had a much deeper and harder character to portray than Hamill's and in my view he was pretty good.
Hamill's hardest task was talking to the puppet Yoda(which was pretty hard) and he did it pretty well.
Christensen had to show someone slowly sliding to the Dark Side, not the easiest of tasks.
I know alot of people are gonna drop bombs on me so let it rip.
Kay, we're not talking about whether the 25 year old kid can kick the 50 year olds' ass.
But Hamill did a very good job. He went from the cocky, almost prebuscent like Luke in ANH, (and actually matured a little during the movie) to the more sombre Luke in ROTJ, not to mention Lucas and the whole crew said that if it wasn't for Hamill's great performance with the Yoda puppet, then the movie would've been ruined.
But hey, Hayden did a good job in ROTS. Not in AOTC though...no...he ruined that movie for me. Him AND Portman.
Originally posted by Tangible GodBut hey, Hayden did a good job in ROTS. Not in AOTC though...no...he ruined that movie for me. Him AND Portman.
Here! Here! Portman wasn't very good in any of them in my opinion.
As for who's a better actor. I'm gonna say Mark. He did a great character in all three movies while Hayden did an alright job through most, but not all, of ROTS and was just .....not good in ATOC. Hamill had to work with a pupet and couldn't hear the guy speaking and moving the pupet, but made us believe Yoda was real.
Originally posted by Tangible God
Kay, we're not talking about whether the 25 year old kid can kick the 50 year olds' ass.But Hamill did a very good job. He went from the cocky, almost prebuscent like Luke in ANH, (and actually matured a little during the movie) to the more sombre Luke in ROTJ, not to mention Lucas and the whole crew said that if it wasn't for Hamill's great performance with the Yoda puppet, then the movie would've been ruined.
But hey, Hayden did a good job in ROTS. Not in AOTC though...no...he ruined that movie for me. Him AND Portman.
Word.
Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
Are you asking who would win in a real fight? Hamil. Sure he is old, but Hayden is near gay.
Originally posted by Tangible God
Kay, we're not talking about whether the 25 year old kid can kick the 50 year olds' ass.But Hamill did a very good job. He went from the cocky, almost prebuscent like Luke in ANH, (and actually matured a little during the movie) to the more sombre Luke in ROTJ, not to mention Lucas and the whole crew said that if it wasn't for Hamill's great performance with the Yoda puppet, then the movie would've been ruined.
But hey, Hayden did a good job in ROTS. Not in AOTC though...no...he ruined that movie for me. Him AND Portman.
Originally posted by Zachara
Here! Here! Portman wasn't very good in any of them in my opinion.As for who's a better actor. I'm gonna say Mark. He did a great character in all three movies while Hayden did an alright job through most, but not all, of ROTS and was just .....not good in ATOC. Hamill had to work with a pupet and couldn't hear the guy speaking and moving the pupet, but made us believe Yoda was real.
✅
Originally posted by Zachara
Here! Here! Portman wasn't very good in any of them in my opinion.As for who's a better actor. I'm gonna say Mark. He did a great character in all three movies while Hayden did an alright job through most, but not all, of ROTS and was just .....not good in ATOC. Hamill had to work with a pupet and couldn't hear the guy speaking and moving the pupet, but made us believe Yoda was real.
Yoda IS real! He's just hiding out somewhere, with BigFoot, and Nessie, and the black michael jackson! How dare you question his existence.
Because it is true, Ashton Kitchen is just a woman with a square jaw and a stupid voice wich he can't even change.
But to get back on topic, I thought Christensen/son (I dunno) was a little bit weird in some scenes, it just didn't always feel natural or something. (this is my opinion, don't get insane everyone)