Originally posted by Great Vengeancenice onthological argument. But at least you used potato so hot you can't eat it rather than that tired Rock lifting one. Still a semantic argument, and contradicting yourself in premise in the first place.
God prepares to annihilate them with a macho god-like attack, then MC says "Hey God, can you make a potato thats so hot even YOU cant eat it?" Then god disappears in a logical poof. The end.
quote: (post)
Originally posted by Great Vengeance
God prepares to annihilate them with a macho god-like attack, then MC says "Hey God, can you make a potato thats so hot even YOU cant eat it?" Then god disappears in a logical poof. The end.
God would actually say: ofcourse...everything is possible through me first i will break a law that would allow the potato to get incredibly hot and not disintergrate and i couldn't hold it, then i would by-pass that law and be able to hold it. then they all look at his face and cease to exist.
but none of them would even think of asking that because they would be crying because they are in the presence of God. Plus God wouldn't kill them unless it was the end of time and they deserved to burn in the lake of fire