Naga sadow vs Exar Kun Ulic /Mace Dooku and malak

Started by Darth Avis6 pages

Like what. I goined last month.

Originally posted by guesswhosback
But if you reread what i was referring to i think you'll find that you miss the point. The Sith bred with the dark jedi and produced half breeds such as Marka ragnos. The Sith still continued to breed among themselves and that is how Naga Sadow and Ludo Kressh were complete sith.

So the dark jedi who landed on the planet were numerous enough to perpetuate a race for over 20,000 years? Is that why Sadow and Kressh and every other Sith Lord on the council under Ragnos looked partially Sith?

No, you're wrong.

Originally posted by Darth Avis
Like what. I goined last month.

well since his name is 'guesswhosback' it probably means either Tommy Vercetti, or DanTheMan aka jackstain. You would not likely remember jackstain, very few these days would, but it is probably one of those two

1 i looked at this sight for like 2 months before joining
2 there is no way GWB is one of them. He's smart.

Originally posted by Darth_Glentract
And remember, Ulic is basically Exar's twin in power. They both had their Amulets and they both trained as Master and Apprentice for several years. I know Nai said it all took place in one year, but the Essential Guide to Characters says different.

The same "essential guide" you have read in that the one Jedi Holocron Luke Skywalker used are two Jedi Holocrons ?

Just for your information the official timeline of the comics:

TOTJ: Knights of the old Republic - 4,000 BBY
TOTJ: The Freedon Nadd Uprising - 3,998 BBY
TOTJ: Dark Lords of the Sith - 3,997 BBY
TOTJ: The Sith War - 3,996 BBY

So...where do that "several years" come from when Ulic and Exar meet first in 3,997 BBY and were defeated in 3,996 BBY ?

About the "Sith / Jedi bred":
Have a look at this picture

The words you can see there are spoken by Marka Ragnos and this might explain why he - being a half-blood - is more powerful than the people with "pure" Sith blood like Sadow and Kressh: His father or mother was a "human" Dark Jedi (descendant from one of the persons the normal Sith had considered to be gods) while Kressh and Sadow come from families that were spawned from interbreding of Dark Jedi and Sith centuries ago.

As far as I figured it out the "Sith" and the "Massasi" seem to be part of the same species with the Massasi being the warrior caste. The "Sith" (like Sadow and Kressh) are Massasi intrebred with the human Dark Jedi while half-bloods (like Ragnos) are people with one parent being a Sith and the other being a human Dark Jedi (so their descendants will be "Sith" again).

Having a look on the Sith Empire like this it look like:
Human Dark Jedi > Half-bloods > Sith > Massasi in terms of force attunement (or force potential). Might be wrong since it's just a theory.

Actually the 100% Sith like Kressh and Sadow's ancestors were only Sith and not dark jedi.

"So the dark jedi who landed on the planet were numerous enough to perpetuate a race for over 20,000 years? Is that why Sadow and Kressh and every other Sith Lord on the council under Ragnos looked partially Sith?

No, you're wrong "

Actually Deux I think you will find that i am right and what you just said has no basis whatsoever for proving me wrong.

Originally posted by guesswhosback
"So the dark jedi who landed on the planet were numerous enough to perpetuate a race for over 20,000 years? Is that why Sadow and Kressh and every other Sith Lord on the council under Ragnos looked partially Sith?

No, you're wrong "

Actually Deux I think you will find that i am right and what you just said has no basis whatsoever for proving me wrong.

Actually, I did prove you wrong. Nai even went so far as to procude the comic picture that showed so. You said that Ragnos was a half Sith and the others were dark jedi. You were wrong. If anything, they are apparently MORE Sith.

Janus actually Goku is a cartoon and he can beat up superman badly. Your sig is so wrong.

Uh, no. Superman would OWN Goku.

Goku is stronger then Kid Buu at SS4 and Kid Buu can blow up a plantet in a second. Are you telling me that superman can do that? Goku is a pwnage king.

Then why didn't kid Buu destroy the planet in a second?

avis, go look at Superman versus Goku thread in the Video Game Versus forum.

People PROVED with scans that Superman can -move- a planet with his power without cutting straight through it. They showed he moves -faster- than Goku, and that he can survive a sundip, which Goku couldn't.

The 2 arent really camparable. Powerlevels dont add up with class systems. I will still go with Goku though i stopped reading that at page 3.

Think of it like this; Goku begins charging up one of his idiotic, screaming energy blast things. So while he's doing his 'Kamehameha' routine, Superman flies right through him at sub-light speeds, and Goku gets vaporized by his own assault. He just isn't fast enough. Or strong enough. Or smart enough. But mostly just not fast enough.

Pretty much. And saying you can't compare them is a cop-out, Avis. You said Goku could win, but when the evidence is against him, suddenly it becomes a situation where they can't be compared. uh uh. Pwned.

yea but i never read the comics. If it was him from the show hes dead i believe

Erm, whatever. I didn't really understand that last post.

let me say it better. I never read the superman comics. Not one of them. I saw like 10 superman epesodes on TV and he didnt look to good there and i think Goku can win if hes fighting TV superman.

How can you live in America and . . . hell, I've gone to Canada, Malaysia, and freakin' India and read Superman comics. Dude, wake up. *end rant*

Anyway, even cartoon Superman would rock Goku's shit. He may get whopped on, but look at what he stands up to doing it.