what would ahve happened

Started by Disappear2 pages

trust me, i'm nothing of a wolverine fanboy. he's been a very dis-interesting character for me for quite a while, and i only really began following his series near the end of the 'enemy of the state' arc. but i agree completely with you, it does sound like something a fanboy would use to justify their perception of logan's strength. the sad truth is, though, that most of these arguments are much more applicable revolving around wolverine than around, say, nightcrawler. wolverine is marvel's cash cow, and if him doing something dramatic like skewering piotr will make them money, they'll do it. and they'll justify it as above.

it does get annoying when marvel makes rules for their characters, such as strength levels and durability and whatnot, but they don't apply them to their favorites...

Originally posted by Disappear
understandable. but the fact is that, historically, various writers have either accepted or ignored the fact that logan shouldn't be able to cut through certain things. hacking through sentinels and danger room bots and metal doors and walls and whatnot. writers will write, and artists will draw, what they find to be dynamic scenes, regardless of whether it matches real world physics. that's the only angle that keeps this argument open.

colossus is a hell of alot more durable than a sentinels armour... his skin can take alot of punishment...

i still believe logan just isnt strong enough to apply the force... 😬

physically, there's no way he is. i agree on that. using comic logic, though, it's still up in the air. if someone comes along and says he can, he likely will. i don't agree with it, i'm just saying it's completely possible until it's truly "established" otherwise.

See the top panel. Thats a perfect example of Cyckes 🙄

that is funny, but not true... 😬