Xbox 360 screenshots

Originally posted by snake_eyes616
games.

He's just being funny, he knows what you mean.

Anyway, where are yall going to preorder the Xbox 360?
I have never preordered anything before and I might want to preorder this.

I think Microsoft is going in a little over their heads. They're not even sure if PDZ is gonna be one of the first games in the launch day.

And seperate hard drive? The originbal Xbox's hardrive is what made the system better than all the others.

I'm just saying that i'm a little dissapointed in Microsoft for going all Sony on us.

It looks okay, not a vast improvement over the original though. PS3 can do better. The graphics are good but not that good.

Originally posted by powerfulone1987
He's just being funny, he knows what you mean.

yeah, looks like its not working that well, but I play on the PS2 and PC if thats what you want to know c_s.

Originally posted by MarioX
It looks okay, not a vast improvement over the original though. PS3 can do better. The graphics are good but not that good.

We're at a point, now, where that doesn't really matter, though. Xbox 360 has good enough graphics for me. It depends on the games now. ✅

Originally posted by MarioX
It looks okay, not a vast improvement over the original though. PS3 can do better. The graphics are good but not that good.

Originally posted by snake_eyes616
yeah, looks like its not working that well, but I play on the PS2 and PC if thats what you want to know c_s.

lol wo those ppl that say it looks same as the old xbox are freaking stupid. i just read up like 10 reviews on the video for the systems and it gives a comparison on them. the original xbox only has a memory of 64MB...thats lower then my pc which is pretty sad. and the xbox360 has a memory of 512MB which is 4x as much as my pc. dude not many computers at all have 512MB memory lol. That's a hell of a video card.

I beg to differ; mine has 1024 MB. 512 is pretty much the bare minimum on RAM these days. The new Windows, when it comes out, will require 2048 MB to run stably.

Originally posted by JKozzy
I beg to differ; mine has 1024 MB. 512 is pretty much the bare minimum on RAM these days. The new Windows, when it comes out, will require 2048 MB to run stably.

Oh, thought you meant the system memory, my b.

And Windows Vista, yes, will require 2 gigs of RAM to run in its full potential. Lesser systems can get away with a gig. The bare minimum is 512, yes, but it will run so cruddy, it wouldn't be funny. Never judge on minimum requirements.

Originally posted by JKozzy
Oh, thought you meant the system memory, my b.

And Windows Vista, yes, will require 2 gigs of RAM to run in its full potential. Lesser systems can get away with a gig. The bare minimum is 512, yes, but it will run so cruddy, it wouldn't be funny. Never judge on minimum requirements.

it takes 2ghz for OPTIMAL performance, but that much memory is unnecessary and a waste of money. Vista will be plagued with all the annoying little bugs that all of Microsofts OS's have when they're first released. 512 is recommended, not required. for superior performance, 1ghz is sufficient

some of the tech forums say that for the best performance, 2ghz is what you need...then they go on to say that it's unnecessary to run the operating system.

Originally posted by crazy_shadow
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/windowsvista/evaluate/hardware/vistarpc.mspx#EEAA

Originally posted by JKozzy
http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2005/09/07/vista_hardware_reqs/

<Ç®äzëÿ_§hädöw > alien how much ram is recommended for the windows visa
<Ç®äzëÿ_§hädöw > vista*
<°°_À£ìéñ2 °°> uhm
<°°_À£ìéñ2 °°> 512
<Ç®äzëÿ_§hädöw > lol thought so

it's a clan pager so...that's why it looks all wierd 🙂

On the MS page, did you not see:

• RAM — PC systems should have 512MB of memory or more.

512 being the bare minimum, yes, but not recommended. It will run Vista, it won't run it well. They wouldn't say that on the Microsoft page, so no, I don't really care what Microsoft has to say. You'd think they would've looked to see if any companies had patented the Vista name, or that they'd actually make XP complete before they started on a new project. I guarantee with 512 ram, one will not have an enjoyable "Windows Vista" experience.

Originally posted by JKozzy
On the MS page, did you not see:

• RAM — PC systems should have 512MB of memory [b]or more.

512 being the bare minimum, yes, but not recommended. It will run Vista, it won't run it well. They wouldn't say that on the Microsoft page, so no, I don't really care what Microsoft has to say. You'd think they would've looked to see if any companies had patented the Vista name, or that they'd actually make XP complete before they started on a new project. I guarantee with 512 ram, one will not have an enjoyable "Windows Vista" experience. [/B]

<°°_À£ìéñ2 °°> lol
<°°_À£ìéñ2 °°> i have run xp
<°°_À£ìéñ2 °°> sucessfully
<Ç®äzëÿ_§hädöw > how much MB RAM do you have?
<°°_À£ìéñ2 °°> with 256
<°°_À£ìéñ2 °°> i have gig
<°°_À£ìéñ2 °°> but i have run it 256
<°°_À£ìéñ2 °°> vista
<°°_À£ìéñ2 °°> takes less rescources than xp
<°°_À£ìéñ2 °°> atleast it manages them better
<Ç®äzëÿ_§hädöw > lol so it should run smooth on 512 mb ram?
<°°_À£ìéñ2 °°> itll run fine on 512

Yeah, and Vista ain't final, so it doesn't matter what he has now, there's nothing for Vista to be able to do. Guess you guys aren't gamers.

not gamers while we are talking threw a gamer clan??

i'm not gonna argue bout this nemore, srry >.>

K. Most newer games don't run well on 512 ram these days, I don't see how you expect it to run smoothly. Just because Microsoft babyfeeds you doesn't mean it's fact.

Why the hell are you guys talking about Winows? Go make your own forum if you want to do that.