Re: Re: Shaky’s view of Time
Originally posted by Atlantis001
But it is like that ! Thats how it is are considered in physics today !In the theory of relativity, the time is taken as a fourth coordinate, and this way we can consider the universe as being four-dimensional, so we can imagine the universe as a three dimensional volume, projected in the time dimension. But you knew that !
I dunno, string theory- despite the various setbacks- seems promising.
Originally posted by Wonderer
Time is fear of the decay of pressence. Therefor it is fear of too quick or slow movement through space. Ultimately it is merely a feeling and nothing really existent.
The problem with your view, as I see it, is, you are assuming that all things move from order to disorder. All things, I believe, are in a constant cycle of rebirth, therefore, order does not lead to disorder but to order.
Originally posted by ShakyamunisonWho said were moving towards disorder? Im assuming by decay he meant change which could cause disorder but from relative points of view.
The problem with your view, as I see it, is, you are assuming that all things move from order to disorder. All things, I believe, are in a constant cycle of rebirth, therefore, order does not lead to disorder but to order.
Time is eternity. We are on an endless journey through existence. So, time does not really matter, and things that don't matter is just the same as not existing. Things come and go infinitely. Like "A flower dies even though we love it, and a weed grows even though we don't love it." Also, if cause and effect is one and the same, then time has now place in the Karma mode of existence. Well, this is true, at least, if you are Buddhist and if you agree with what I'm saying.