Spiderman Vs Batman (Both have Superman Strength)

Started by TwisterGameX2 pages

Spiderman Vs Batman (Both have Superman Strength)

They both have the strength, of Superman, and they keep their regular stuff too.

Batman without a doubt. He has better fighting skills, and the main factor that was helping out Spider-Man in the old fight was that he had super strength. Batman wins.

If they just have the strength of superman, spiderman still has his spider senses, and increased speed, I still doubt that batman could hit spiderman, but anyways this is a dumb topic that is just trying to make Batman be able to beat spiderman when he couldn't normally

Spider-Man still wins. Sorry.

Maybe you could make Spider-Man blind and have no legs and only one arm again? 😉

Originally posted by Orestes
Spider-Man still wins. Sorry.

Maybe you could make Spider-Man blind and have no legs and only one arm again? 😉

🤨 Are you talking about ?

Spider sense and gadgets.

I'd say that both having Superman-strength actually increases Spider-Man's chances of winning. At their normal levels, Batman could still give Spider-Man a good fight by using the gadgets he pulls from his utility belt. But if each one is as strong as Superman, then the utility belt and the web shooters won't make any difference. Then Spider-Man can just use his spider sense and fast reflexes to win.

Originally posted by TwisterGameX
🤨 Are you talking about ?

This thread: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t370003.html

😎

Originally posted by Orestes
This thread: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t370003.html

😎

🤨

Batman wins, true spiderman still has his spider sense but, batman is the better fighter and if they both have superman level strength would I be correct in guessing they have his durability as well.Because if they do agility, gadgets and web won't play a huge roll in this it will come down to h2h and Batman wins hands down.

They have equal strength, but Spidey still has precog, better agility and superior speed. Spidey still wins.

Spidey gets his ass owned. Batman would kick his ass so bad. Spidey would loose so bad becuz he would never land a hit on batman.

Originally posted by Orestes
Spider-Man still wins. Sorry.

Maybe you could make Spider-Man blind and have no legs and only one arm again? 😉

I thought I was the only one that noticed this...

*Sigh*

What about, we take ALL Spiderman's powers away, and Batman's as well. Oops, forgot, Batman, doesn't have any super powers, does he? In this case, since Batman is used to FIGHTING super-powered characters, and Spiderman is used to RELYING on his super powers, Batman would finally be able to beat Spiderman.

Would that, finally, make everybody happy, since we have then proved that Batman CAN beat Spiderman?

I'll go with Spidey on this one. His agility is above that of the best human's agility skills thus making him nigh impossible for Batman to touch.

Originally posted by Dreampanther
What about, we take ALL Spiderman's powers away, and Batman's as well. Oops, forgot, Batman, doesn't have any super powers, does he? In this case, since Batman is used to FIGHTING super-powered characters, and Spiderman is used to RELYING on his super powers, Batman would finally be able to beat Spiderman.

Would that, finally, make everybody happy, since we have then proved that Batman CAN beat Spiderman?


Congratulations. Worst post of this day.

Spiderman still have superior advantages over Batman, even if they are fewer. Spiderman still wins.

Spiderman has hardly any advantages over batman. Batman being a Superior fighter would be enough to take Spiderman down. Spiderman wouldnt be able to land a hit on Batman becuz he would just dodge everything. The thing that would decide this match is who is a better fighter, which of course is Batman by along shot.

Okay, I don't mean to be jerk, Batman fans...or for you Bat fanboys.

I'll put it like this....Batman has better fighing skills than Superman, but would never touch Supes if written correctly.

Spidey is TOOOO fast and agile for Batman to touch, period....end of story.