Should Bush help Trinidad?

so you'd rather have hundreds of people die, and not do a damn thing is that it?

CHina is not a poor country. So isn't India. Its just that wealth is not reaching the general public.

Originally posted by Saratn
so you'd rather have hundreds of people die, and not do a damn thing is that it?

But why help them? Help the 400 that die in Detroit first.......then the other 20000 in the Us (probably more) then you can think aboot helping others....

Trinidad isn't worried about wealth. they are worried about their people i am not saying ship hundreds of dollars to them.

Originally posted by Saratn
Trinidad isn't worried about wealth. they are worried about their people i am not saying ship hundreds of dollars to them.

So you can't send the military, you can't send any people, you can't send money. Then what can you send?

What the hell could people do about this? You want Bush to do something about a place he has never even heard off, let alone stand can find on the world map but you have no idea what he should do. And you can't think of any reason why he should do it? Except for its a nice thing to do?

Don't you think he should solve the problems in the US first?

Doesn't matter if he helps out or not. He's damned if he does and damned if he doesn't.

Thats just bullshit.. I would care if he does go in with the military (basically the only thing he can do) And I wouldn't care if he doesn't. Its not the US its responsibility to do anything here.

And as long as there are worse problems out there international organisations or the US should not concern themselves with this. At least not to much. It just doesn't have anything to do with them and it doesn't have a high enough priority to change that.

I never said not to send people i said the he can't send the army, because he would be breaking the law. and i have gave you reasons why. they need the help, their population isn't a lot, and their nation is in danger everyday.

Can I ask a question...

Why Trinidad?

It's not in a state of panic... it's birth rate is still higher then the death rate.. their life expectancy isn't particularly low. It's doing fine financially.

Originally posted by Saratn
I never said not to send people i said the he can't send the army, because he would be breaking the law. and i have gave you reasons why. they need the help, their population isn't a lot, and their nation is in danger everyday.

Then how can he help, what should he do? The country is doing fine. It has plenty of money, so it doesn't need that.. What could anybody do to help there?

Originally posted by Fishy
Thats just bullshit.. I would care if he does go in with the military (basically the only thing he can do) And I wouldn't care if he doesn't. Its not the US its responsibility to do anything here.

And as long as there are worse problems out there international organisations or the US should not concern themselves with this. At least not to much. It just doesn't have anything to do with them and it doesn't have a high enough priority to change that.

Originally posted by FeceMan
YOU might not care, but the overwhelming majority will ***** about what Bush does no matter what. He could do everything the Democrats wanted to a tee, and he would still be OMG TEH WURST PRESIDENT EVAR!!!111!!!111

True...but so did the Republicans when Clinton was in Office......so that'S no big difference...now he has to do the right thing because he will get called on it either way....

Originally posted by FeceMan
YOU might not care, but the overwhelming majority will ***** about what Bush does no matter what. He could do everything the Democrats wanted to a tee, and he would still be OMG TEH WURST PRESIDENT EVAR!!!111!!!111

You really are full of shit, you know that right?

Bush has brought this crap onto himself. I don't see anything like what you are saying happening anywhere. Everybody on this forum except for maybe one or two people that has replied in this thread has said they are against doing anything about Trinidad, and most of those people wouldn't vote for Bush.

Seriously dude, but Bush isn't as hated as he is without reason. You might think so, but thats just bullshit. If Bush would act here people would make a decision on what to think of it based on facts, if he's really helping the country the people will think he's doing good stuff. If he's hurting it the people will think he sucks even more.

Just look at the Tsunami, nobody critizes Bush for giving money there.

Originally posted by Bardock42
True...but so did the Republicans when Clinton was in Office......so that'S no big difference...now he has to do the right thing because he will get called on it either way....

However, Bardock, remember: there is no absolute right or wrong, so what's right to you might be wrong to someone else, and what's wrong to you might be right to someone else.

WE LOVE THE TOLERANCE!

no the country is not fine. have you read any of the articles at all? any of you? more than the ones i have provided? they are not a wealthy country. they need help. and the least i can do is try. i am not going to sit around and just let this go by without some thought. plus who are we to say if we should go or not. it is up to Bush, and he does not only what is right for the US but for others.

Originally posted by Fishy
You really are full of shit, you know that right?

Bush has brought this crap onto himself. I don't see anything like what you are saying happening anywhere. Everybody on this forum except for maybe one or two people that has replied in this thread has said they are against doing anything about Trinidad, and most of those people wouldn't vote for Bush.

Seriously dude, but Bush isn't as hated as he is without reason. You might think so, but thats just bullshit. If Bush would act here people would make a decision on what to think of it based on facts, if he's really helping the country the people will think he's doing good stuff. If he's hurting it the people will think he sucks even more.

Just look at the Tsunami, nobody critizes Bush for giving money there.

No, I'm not full of shit. Most of the people on this forum aren't the country. I never said Bush didn't do anything to be hated, nor did I say otherwise. In fact, I never mentioned it.

My post still stands.

what Bush is or isn't doing is quite debatable, and we really aren't debating upon the good/bad things he has done. we are debating if he should help/not Trinidad.

Originally posted by Saratn
no the country is not fine. have you read any of the articles at all? any of you? more than the ones i have provided? they are not a wealthy country. they need help. and the least i can do is try. i am not going to sit around and just let this go by without some thought. plus who are we to say if we should go or not. it is up to Bush, and he does not only what is right for the US but for others.

Are they the only pieces of news you have ever read?

Because that is nothing.

There are murders and kidnappings every day in most countries... there is no way in hell America could do anything to stop them... and to be honest they have far bigger problems in their own country...

I suggest you watch the news tonight...

Originally posted by FeceMan
I don't remember the Clinton years very well, unfortunately. It was only after the 2000 election when I really started to take an interest in politics.

However, Bardock, remember: there is no absolute right or wrong, so what's right to you might be wrong to someone else, and what's wrong to you might be right to someone else.

WE LOVE THE TOLERANCE!

Yes...of course but there is something that might be best for your country...and I don't think he did that yet.

i have read a lot more than you would know. i have two friends that live in Trinidad, and they tell me how it is like. and it is a difference of murders and kidnappings in the US and Trinidad. Trinidad is small compared to a lot of other countries.