Originally posted by Victor Von Doom
Not Shakespeare, Joyce, Nietzsche, Hegel, Kant?
When I say “not on the same page”, I don’t mean that the ones I mentioned are any better than the artists, I just mean it’s a different type of intelligence.
I should have been more specific when I made the topic, but I was focusing on the scientific intelligence. I’m not sure why, but when I think of intelligence I think of scientists, mathematicians, and the like. Not sure why I wouldn’t consider artists, since they can be just as intelligent, if not more so, but just in a completely different way.
I guess I was looking at intelligence as…people who have made major contributions to science and technology as a result of their intelligence.
hehe BF that was a pretty good one 😉 well it all depends on what field we are talking about, Einstein cant be called more intellegnt then say Bach or Mozard they did not do the same thing, I'd say the most intellegent person ever, is the one that is a master I mean really really really really sharp in more fields then any other, say a guy thats exstremly good, at almust all sports, almust all instruments, can figure out everything in math, thinks logicly, very good with people, and so on, basicly qualifies exstremly well in many diffrent things, not just 1 specific thing like some of the once in the list do.
Originally posted by Ulven
I'd say NewtonIf any of you have had any physics, you know how much he has meant for science. I'm dazzeled over how many thing that chap managed to explain/understand.
If I had to chose from that list, I'd say he was the most "valuable" to mankind...
Yeah,man I agree with you man.
Cuz Stephen Hawkings although brilliant in a scientific arena Bill Gates appeals to more people with his marketing brilliance the man is a billionare after what 15-20 years......one of the richest men on the planet......anyway Hawkings is brilliant just writes about quasars and black holes and gravity and yeah yeah tough reading