Who is the greater of two evils: George W Bush or Osama Bin Laden?

Started by mr.smiley4 pages

Who is the greater of two evils: George W Bush or Osama Bin Laden?

I realy disturbes me to think about this,but sometimes I can't help but think that Bush is just as bad.Hell,I think he's hiding something.He's just put us in to shitty of a postition (in my opion).He's turned this into a war between good and evil,but I belive it just boils down to money and how much he can screw over the poor.

Sorry Mr smiley...I can't comment right now....I have a fever and it's coming out in my posts...... 🤨

Why don't we have a fever smiley...????

I don't know?????????????????.................................................

poll ?

Damn!I always forget that!

Osama Bin Laden

Bush is not a bad man people, perhaps stupid, but he thinks what he does is right. Osama Bin Laden is a vengeful man who doesnt think twice about the death of others... the choice is clear.

EDIT: I forgot about how bush caused innocent death in the bombings...hell there both not fit for positions of power.

To play devil's advocate, Osama bin Laden most probably thinks what he does is right too.

Although I agree GWB is more stupid than evil. But how exactly does one quantify an abstract subjective concept like "evil"?

There both bad. Bush kills and goes to war for Money, Osama is just messed up in the head and power hungry.

Two madmen killing in the name of their God.

One gets away with it because he's a president, corrupts his people and uses them. At least Osama is honestly evil.

-AC

Crazy comparison.

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
To play devil's advocate, Osama bin Laden most probably thinks what he does is right too.

Although I agree GWB is more stupid than evil. But how exactly does one quantify an abstract subjective concept like "evil"?

Yeah your right, every man thinks what hes doing is right... 😕

And about evil, yes its a very subjective concept but it can be defined to a degree. For instance giving your life to save somone else is 'good'...perhaps good can be defined as going against your natural tendencies for an ideal that by our standards is 'right'. Evil in contrast could be defined as succumbing to natures flaws, anger, hate, pride etc.

Yeah You may not like bush but Osoma is just a evil coward who has his brain washed bitches do all the work for him Its not even close on whos more evil

-delete-

Originally posted by Great Vengeance
And about evil, yes its a very subjective concept but it can be defined to a degree. For instance giving your life to save somone else is 'good'...
What if you're giving your life in order to protect someone "evil". Like the soldiers of the Fuhrer?

One man uses fear in an attempt to force his manifesto onto millions of people, shows little regard for international law, violates peace-keeping efforts and then uses the media to spread his propoganda. The other is Osma Bin Laden.

Rather trite, I know...but the truth is that they both represent the ugly face of religious ideologues. Whereas most of the world are happy to respect the beliefs of others, these two have made it their life's work to cause fervent anger all in the name of bearded dudes who wore sandals...

Both believe they are 'morally correct' and both are fuucking-up this big, beautiful world...

Originally posted by xmarksthespot
What if you're giving your life in order to protect someone "evil". Like the soldiers of the Fuhrer?

Then you are even more good, giving your life for somone who wouldnt do the same indicates an unnatural amount of nobility.

Originally posted by Great Vengeance
Then you are even more good, giving your life for somone who wouldnt do the same indicates an unnatural amount of nobility.
Huh? Maybe you misunderstood my post, because you're basically saying the Schutzstaffel - Hitler's SS - were good. 😖

Originally posted by Great Vengeance
Bush is not a bad man people, perhaps stupid, but he thinks what he does is right. Osama Bin Laden is a vengeful man who doesnt think twice about the death of others... the choice is clear.

EDIT: I forgot about how bush caused innocent death in the bombings...hell there both not fit for positions of power.

Bush is far from stupid. So far from it.

I think its a fair statement to say bush is less evil than osama, based on the fact that osama struck first. Bush still isnt fit for his power though.