BOTH should be edited. Even if there is no actual nudity (if you don't count ass crack) it is still an elicit photo not to be viewed by the general audience of KMC, which happens to be mostly underage kids.
I say a stiff warning, combined with her photo mishap in the Members Pic thread should be a 3 day ban.
Originally posted by Ken Kenobia warnin is good enough
BOTH should be edited. Even if there is no actual nudity (if you don't count ass crack) it is still an elicit photo not to be viewed by the general audience of KMC, which happens to be mostly underage kids.I say a stiff warning, combined with her photo mishap in the Members Pic thread should be a 3 day ban.
Originally posted by snehin
tho the link more than tha pic
Yeah, but that doesn't matter, both are against the rules
Originally posted by snehin
a warnin is good enough
I agree...but Ken is the Specialist...
Originally posted by Ken Kenobi
BOTH should be edited. Even if there is no actual nudity (if you don't count ass crack) it is still an elicit photo not to be viewed by the general audience of KMC, which happens to be mostly underage kids.I say a stiff warning, combined with her photo mishap in the Members Pic thread should be a 3 day ban.
Originally posted by Bardock42
If not that..what can make you an expert?Oh really....hmm.....even more reason to bet on it....
I am no expert because all the Global Moderators act differently, it is up to them to decide. IMO these are warnable offenses, then combined with her previous picture oopsie, I'd say she deserves a 3 day ban. But that's just me.
Originally posted by Ken Kenobi
I am no expert because all the Global Moderators act differently, it is up to them to decide. IMO these are warnable offenses, then combined with her previous picture oopsie, I'd say she deserves a 3 day ban. But that's just me.
Wow....good you are not a mod anymore...I'd be scared.....
Originally posted by Ken Kenobinah i still think a warnin is more than enough
I am no expert because all the Global Moderators act differently, it is up to them to decide. IMO these are warnable offenses, then combined with her previous picture oopsie, I'd say she deserves a 3 day ban. But that's just me.
Originally posted by Lanaa warnin more than enough!!
More than enough?She's screwed up and it's not the first time.
Originally posted by a1hsaucetrue so i still say a warnin more than enough she dint mean harm so a warnin is more than enough
oh leave the poor girl alone, do we all remember a certain thread called "Rate your rack" ?