Originally posted by Escape81
If you're comparing him to the duel with Dooku, then I disagree. You see, (and I'm not accusing you) I have seen people dictate all the time how much Dooku dominates his master. While I disagree, I can also offer proof. Dooku -never- touched Yoda. Palpatine did, and in terms of 'damage', it was harder than Yoda hit him. Palpatine nailed him and it nearly did knock Yoda unconscious. Yoda did recover and Force-pushed Palpatine across the room, but Palpatine nearly instantly recovered.And as for Palpatine shifting the fight to 'pods', it makes sense. You just said it. They were balanced with swords. Palpatine's goal was to survive the fight. So that would require either escaping, or knocking out Yoda, or killing him. If they weren't making progress with the blades, he'd try to tip the odds firmly in his favor.
Which were his intentions.
And he failed his intentions.
If Dooku lost to Yoda, And Sidious won over Yoda (Not saying that's what happened, using an example), do you really think this means that Sidious could defeat Dooku? Because he faced an opponent that defeated his current objective?
Let's elminate the circumstances from the Dooku fight.
Anakin killed Dooku, but Dooku totally served Kenobi. Does this mean Anakin can kill Kenobi? Wait a minute.... zOMG! KENOBI DEFEATED ANAKIN! TOO LATE!
Yoda knocked HIMSELF. Watch the movie again. He absorbs Sidious' lightning, blasts it back at him and Yoda's own tremendous power knocks him down to the Senate Floor. Before Yoda did this, did you see the expression on Sidious' face? Not a very victorious one.