einstines formula E=MC2

Started by xyz jedi3 pages

you know it is only a thoery

and me bein' thirteen doesn't mean I'm an idiot, just ignorant.

Oh here we go...

Look admit your wrong and move on.. theres lot of theories that goven half your life... can you prove that your actually exist?? or this isn't someones dream??

E=MC2 has been proven time and time again, can you even give a reason why it isn't a fact??

Sorry, but if someone insults me cause hes ignorant.. I would concider him an Idiot...

you're a little imature for a 20 year old

also i am probably wrong i think.

So why argue about it?
Seems entirely stupid to me.

Originally posted by xyz jedi
you're a little imature for a 20 year old

So you come here, call everyone "****ing idiots" and then confess your wrong... then you call me imature??? for what? correcting you? proving your wrong? or perhaps because I disagreed with you...

Perhaps you just shouldn't run your mouth about things you don't understand?

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss

Perhaps you just shouldn't run your mouth about things you don't understand?

So please explain to be simply in your own words how E=MC2 fits into critical mass 🙂

Critical mass is the smallest amount of radioactive material needed to create a nuclear reaction...
To create a successful reaction the amount of energy needed is entered into the formula, which will give the amount of mass to react...

Very brief... but its been 3 years since physics A-levels 😉 I'll be glad to hear your corrections

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
Critical mass is the smallest amount of radioactive material needed to create a nuclear reaction...
To create a successful reaction the amount of energy needed is entered into the formula, which will give the amount of mass to react...

Very brief... but its been 3 years since physics A-levels 😉 I'll be glad to hear your corrections

kind off although it would never be used this way as other equations work better
for calculating critical mass, its better for working out yield - Thats how Feynman and Oppenheimer did it anyway. Kind of a trick question really.

Do you know why Einstein is considered a bit of a plaguist over E = MC2 its interesting. If your twenty one why are you chatting up fifteen year old girls?

plaguist? whats that mean.... if you mean why Einstein could be considered a plaguist, I think I read about it a couple of years ago... I believe it comes from him working in a patents office combined with the fact he had no real qualifications in the fields of his work... and they think he got his ideas from patents people brought in... (I will have to re-read that book... real good read)

Chatting up 15 year old girls??! Thats abit out of the blue!! I talk to alot of people here... I don't hide my age 😉(or my sex for that matter!), or my where I come from... I'm not trying to virtual date at all!

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
plaguist? whats that mean.... if you mean why Einstein could be considered a plaguist, I think I read about it a couple of years ago... I believe it comes from him working in a patents office combined with the fact he had no real qualifications in the fields of his work... and they think he got his ideas from patents people brought in... (I will have to re-read that book... real good read)

Chatting up 15 year old girls??! Thats abit out of the blue!! I talk to alot of people here... I don't hide my age 😉(or my sex for that matter!), or my where I come from... I'm not trying to virtual date at all!

actually E =mc2 is derived from other peoples equations but he gives them no credit - I can't remember who I know Newton did E = D mc2 others took this further

thats if you can prove he knew about them... He did a series of papers on statistical mechanics only to find that j. willard gibbs had done it already....

Do you know what his first papers were about???

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
thats if you can prove he knew about them... He did a series of papers on statistical mechanics only to find that j. willard gibbs had done it already....

Do you know what his first papers were about???

he knew about it the work was published before him he made some quote about plagurism later on I will look for it on google at some point It will all be there its pretty famous stuff🙂

I don't know then! its like the telephone... Who created that?? theres about 4 people who claim to have been copied by the others...

Well if they didn't come to the conclusions themselves after getting soo close they must be kicking themselves!!! I guess he was the first to actually write it down though! Its not like its the only thing he came out with...

His first paper was on physics of fluids in drinking straws... lol

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
I don't know then! its like the telephone... Who created that?? theres about 4 people who claim to have been copied by the others...

Well if they didn't come to the conclusions themselves after getting soo close they must be kicking themselves!!! I guess he was the first to actually write it down though! Its not like its the only thing he came out with...

His first paper was on physics of fluids in drinking straws... lol

I remember Feynman did a critique on E=Mc2 because it is a limited Equation better derivations exist now

just so you know:
power equalls mv2 over time
power also equalls E over time
see the relationship? It all makes sense. E=mv2. I mean light and mass is like shit and cake. Don't mix.
and Kenetic energy 1/2mv2??? if it's kenetic (at rest) there is no velocity so it would be 0. It just seems unplausable. P=Fv or mav, E=mvv or mv2

Kinetic energy = 1/2mv2 is a given formula...
I think you need to go talk to your school teachers... Your obviously confused and need to recap some basic things... You seem to be hell bend to trying to disprove given scientific principles..

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
Kinetic energy = 1/2mv2 is a given formula...
I think you need to go talk to your school teachers... Your obviously confused and need to recap some basic things... You seem to be hell bend to trying to disprove given scientific principles..

hell bent perhaps but I agree with you 🙂

sorry i was high, 'n' mistaken, 'n' taught poorly bout kenetic NRG