Jedi vs. Sith

Started by DrDoom1011 pagesPoll

Who takes this?

Jedi vs. Sith

ROTS Anakin
Kit Fisto
Mace Windu
Dark Woman
Quinlan Vos
Qui-Gon

vs.

Darth Bane
Darth Malak
Darth Bandon

You hath broke thou rules! lol

Jedi win.

😂

Re: Jedi vs. Sith

Originally posted by DrDoom101
ROTS Anakin
Kit Fisto
Mace Windu
Dark Woman
Quinlan Vos
Qui-Gon

vs.

Darth Bane
Darth Malak
Darth Bandon

The Sith are outnumbered and have Bandon with them.

Who do ya think'll win?

Bandon might be a match for Kit. Jedi still win.

no ur all wrong! remember kreia out side Tulak Hords tomb????

"if you compared your skills to that of the ancient sith lords, you would be but a child with a stick, compared to the prowess of the ancient sith lords" or something along those lines. this proves that saber skills are getting more shabby in time. therefore the jedi would be pwned

What about ALL Jedi vs. ALL Sith?

That'll be one hell of a long thread!

oh...not that Kreia quote again.

She is talking about ancient Sith Lords using lightsabers. From her own point of view and as far as we know Tulak Hord (a lightsaber prodigy) and Freedon Nadd (a one-man-army) are the only "ancient" Sith Lords who have used lightsabers unless you think she calls people who were around 40 (Exar, Ulic) or 10 (Revan, Malak) years before the events shown "ancient". I doubt that.

The only person she might have thought about (and I still doubt that) is Malak (since Bandon was no real "Sith Lord" and Bane lived nearly 3000 years after Kreia) and while Malak might be able to win a 2vs1 against a pair of those Jedi (as long as you don't throw Mace Windu + another one at him) I don't think that Bandon and Bane can win a 2vs1 on their own. Kill somebody ? Yes. Win ? I don't think so.

So...if they aren't fighting on the Star Forge (which would give Malak the ability to heal himself for several times not even thinking about infinite amounts of droids and stuff like that) I'd say the Jedi win.

Originally posted by Nai Fohl
oh...not that Kreia quote again.

She is talking about ancient Sith Lords using lightsabers. From her own point of view and as far as we know Tulak Hord (a lightsaber prodigy) and Freedon Nadd (a one-man-army) are the only "ancient" Sith Lords who have used lightsabers unless you think she calls people who were around 40 (Exar, Ulic) or 10 (Revan, Malak) years before the events shown "ancient". I doubt that.

The only person she might have thought about (and I still doubt that) is Malak (since Bandon was no real "Sith Lord" and Bane lived nearly 3000 years after Kreia) and while Malak might be able to win a 2vs1 against a pair of those Jedi (as long as you don't throw Mace Windu + another one at him) I don't think that Bandon and Bane can win a 2vs1 on their own. Kill somebody ? Yes. Win ? I don't think so.

So...if they aren't fighting on the Star Forge (which would give Malak the ability to heal himself for several times not even thinking about infinite amounts of droids and stuff like that) I'd say the Jedi win.

Well said Nai.

great point but wrong. even lucas says that the army of the manderloriens could "anilate" the GAR becos of the difference in melee skills. thats 1.5 mil on 30,000 at the max, all becos of the skills at that time. also he says revan could take most of council alone showing his skill

Originally posted by Darth Takáta
great point but wrong. even lucas says that the army of the manderloriens could "anilate" the GAR becos of the difference in melee skills. thats 1.5 mil on 30,000 at the max, all becos of the skills at that time. also he says revan could take most of council alone showing his skill

Where did he say that ? Supershadow.com ? Normally he doesn't care much about the EU and he doesn't even comment fights shown in the movies not even talking about things that will never happen (Revan vs PT Council Members, Mandalorians vs any PT army).

And I wouldn't be suprised if the Mandalorian Army (an entire race of warriors) would be able to take down any PT army because horribly outnumbering them and being ruthless b1ches.

By the way: Since when do Mandalorians use melee weapons primarily - did I miss something or did the glass planets with Vibroblades ?

Well in Kotor the republic and the Mandelorians did have a limited use of energy shields. So yeah they would have known how to fight with those weapons far from their primary weapon however. It wouldn't make much sense if that would be their primary weapon.

well, malak could probably take mace or at least fight him to a draw, bandon could take kit if he got lucky very lucky like if kit was tied up and gagged on a chair,knocked unconcious, while bleeding to death and completely dissconnected from the force he might last a bit maybe long enough for him to realize that he was an obnoxious underdeveloped charachter who sucks and end himself. Bane however is supposed to be VERY powerful i dont quite think he could take the rest but he could at least take two of them. Jedi win unless the two sith pull something amazing, like doing the medpac glitch from kotor.

As for those lucas quotes i'd like to see direct quotes as it sounds like you got supershadowed, mandalorians were jedi killers and damn good ones too, mind you if there were 1.5 million ants they would probably pwn the pt council as they're pretty crappy. It's amazing how they can sense slight emotional changes yet not detect a conspiracy involving almost everyone in the bloody republic. didn't they think having a dead person make them an army was a bit too convient?especially in a time where the darkside was strong, that's just being borderline retarded.Even after "the shroud of the darkside was lifted" they still had no clue what was going on. I swear palpatine must have somehow made a law where the jedi were required to be made up of the mentally challenged. A la fin to the max

lol. try the force.net

man the jedi always wins damnit. those sith also died by jedi didnt they?