Originally posted by SaTsuJiN
no, you missed the point.. his claim was that having neo in the game would have made ETM a better game... which isnt the case.. you can put whipped cream on dogshit but that dont mean its gonna taste better 😛
I'm just saying that i would rather play with Neo, ETM might be great... but i dont really want to play with Ghost or Niobe. So i wouldnt like it, but other people might think its great.
no, you missed the point.. his claim was that having neo in the game would have made ETM a better game... which isnt the case.. you can put whipped cream on dogshit but that dont mean its gonna taste better : A Quote.
Haha, I like that analogy.
Well when I first put Enter the Matrix in and played it, it was really fun and different, but the it got very repetitive and the manual said that different but combinations would cause new attacks to happen and that there were endless amounts of moves that could be perform and that just wasn't the case.
I performed the same moves through the entire game.
And after I dragged, let me repeat DRAGGED myself to complete the game, I just didn't have the need to play as the other character and play the game again.
As much as they said each character experiences a different game, I just could believe it. Especially after I gave it a chance and played as the other one and the same thing happened in the beginning of the game as it did with the othe character.
They went into the building to get the letter out of th post office box.
Now how is that a different experience when they are doing the exact same thing with each character.
Maybe when they said different experience, they meant on the driving levels when Niobi drives and Ghost shoots.
Whoa, now hit me over the head with a baseball bat and call me Susan. But is that a different kind of gaming experience all together or what.
I don't think so.
Originally posted by powerfulone1987
no, you missed the point.. his claim was that having neo in the game would have made ETM a better game... which isnt the case.. you can put whipped cream on dogshit but that dont mean its gonna taste better : A Quote.Haha, I like that analogy.
Well when I first put Enter the Matrix in and played it, it was really fun and different, but the it got very repetitive and the manual said that different but combinations would cause new attacks to happen and that there were endless amounts of moves that could be perform and that just wasn't the case.
I performed the same moves through the entire game.
And after I dragged, let me repeat DRAGGED myself to complete the game, I just didn't have the need to play as the other character and play the game again.
As much as they said each character experiences a different game, I just could believe it. Especially after I gave it a chance and played as the other one and the same thing happened in the beginning of the game as it did with the othe character.
They went into the building to get the letter out of th post office box.
Now how is that a different experience when they are doing the exact same thing with each character.
Maybe when they said different experience, they meant on the driving levels when Niobi drives and Ghost shoots.
Whoa, now hit me over the head with a baseball bat and call me Susan. But is that a different kind of gaming experience all together or what.
I don't think so.
Umm... no i didnt... and that wasnt his point...
Originally posted by sith_darth_jay
have you played trough out the whole game with both characters, cuz the stroy changes when you play with one or the other, as well as the levels.It's not only the driving levels when Niobi drives and Ghost shoots
yeah, but the change isnt enough to make it worth it...
Originally posted by DanZeke25
Well ETM didnt have Neo.. i mean come on.. who wants to play as ghost and niobe?
*point up* .. yes it was his point.. not that he was living or dying by this statement.. but rather saying that having neo would have enhanced the ETM experience.. and with terrible collision detection and graphics.. this simply could not be so
Originally posted by pr1983
Umm... no i didnt... and that wasnt his point...
I didn't write that "point". It's suppose to be a quote from somebody else, but I messed up and had to hurry up and get offline so I just cut and pasted it into my message. That's why I put " A Quote", right after it to let yall know it was a quote from somebody else.
I started writing after the quote where it said, "I like that analogy".
Sorry, for being so confusing.
Originally posted by powerfulone1987
I didn't write that "point". It's suppose to be a quote from somebody else, but I messed up and had to hurry up and get offline so I just cut and pasted it into my message. That's why I put " A Quote", right after it to let yall know it was a quote from somebody else.
I started writing after the quote where it said, "I like that analogy".
Sorry, for being so confusing.
np... 🙂