<<2. Why is someone a fanboy for saying FLash could beat Thanos? Why is someone a fanboy for saying that Wolverine could beat Namor? Or that Living Tribunal could beat Batman? They're just all terrible mismatches, yet some still argue for the side which is EASILY outclassed.>>
yeah, and it's because these feats (vibrating and blowing him up, traveling to the end of time with him, infinity punching him) are not NEARLY consistent enough to make me believe they could actually work against someone of thanos's level. someone who GRABS SS WITH HIS HANDS AND PUMMELS HIM INTO UNCONSCIOUSNESS.
i have an idea:
any flash fan that can post of a scan of any one of those 3 attacks (or any of the others flash fans claim will net him a win, like the mythical 'stealing his speed) working against someone of thanos's level (or NEAR thanos's level), and i will apologize to all you flash-ophiles on this here thread.
if you cannot, how about you all admit that those feats are ENORMOUSLY/NEAR-IMPOSSIBLY UNLIKELY to work against thanos.
if you can't show them against someone of thanos's level, show a scan of each attack happening, explain the context in which it happened, and let everyone make an EDUCATED assessment as to whether the attacks really ARE as feasible as some of you say. if they are as feasible as y'all claim, this shouldn't be a problem. i for one have never seen ANY of those aforementioned attacks, and i'd love to have a look.
fair enough?