is it true that everyone wants what is good?

Started by jOHN_Anderton3 pages
Originally posted by debbiejo
I don't believe you should please others at your own expense...you must always be aware of "Your" truth......The truth of who you are does go in conflict with what others want from you at times....You must be true to yourself first.

Well put.

I would also say "good" is anything that illuminates the dark, dispels ignorance, increases knowledge of ones true self, opposes entropy, increases harmony, understanding, compassion and love. Goodness is just what you feel it is. Thinking about the obvious can get one tied into knots.

So, here's another question: Why do we think we can actually arrive at the truth by reason alone? I don't think this is really possible. We are not just reasoning beings. Our feeling/emotional/raw perceptual capacities are far more fundamental to who we are. Language and symbolic reasoning are very recent developments for our species. Sometimes it seems we live exclusively on the planum temporale (speech association center) in the left hemisphere. We have negated everything else: art, music, feeling states and deep subjectivity - as something less than serious and of no value when considering so called philosophically important questions.

Know what I mean? 😕

"So, here's another question: Why do we think we can actually arrive at the truth by reason alone? "

Truth as a universal or subjective experience?

In a way that comes back to the 'goodness' debate also, and a whole bunch of other things too for that matter.

Are we talking universally or subjectively.
It is quite possible to reasonably argue for either. And if truth, or whatever for that matter, is more than just reasoning and logic how are we to understand it if it can't be communicated in language and does that negate the possibility of further discussion in a puff of *don't worry, you will just know when you get it*

Don't get me wrong. I do feel (lol, how ironic 😉) that there is certainly more to this world than can be explained. However, does that necessarily mean that we won't be able to explain it one day?

Maybe there is something to be said for disappearing in a puff of *OMG, I just got it* lol

Originally posted by StrangeDays
thus we arrive back at defining good.
maybe its not neccesary to define good in order for this to be true though. if people want something, then they obviously see it as being good, even if it may be morally wrong, for example 9/11 or the Nazis, but people who do evil things do them because they are corrupt and believe that these evil things are good therefore they ARE wanting what is good, its just that what they believe to be good is different to the opinion of the majority.

So in this case, its a tautology (i think) because it doesnt rely on anything else to be true...confusing myself now! 😕

YOUR confused? Me too!! I may be in over my head with either of you Biscuit or Strange Days, but I'm just wondering if we don't sell ourselves short by being too analytical and rely too much on words for meaning. Now thats a hell of a thing to say, I know, and something that might get one booted right off the faculty no matter what discipline one might be in, but, still, I propose that there is an ocean of experience that lies within us, unexplored, undiscovered, and yes, the nature of which is currently beyond mere words - but only because there is no consensus of experience - yet! Our entire Civilization rests on, is constructed from - a frame work of symbols, words, language. . . Is it so implausible to entertain the idea that, within the province of the mind, particularly in the realm of deep subjectivity, there is in fact a common ground of experience among individuals, a meeting of the mind so to speak, that affords intelligible communication that is more immediate than the trickle of information that is conveyed by mere words alone? I wonder. And I wonder if a quasi scientific approach could be adopted for the mapping of such new levels of experience so that eventually a consensus of experience is arrived at. It's just that we are so totally outward directed and have been for centuries, and to great effect as anyone would agree, what with the rapidly developing technologies that began with the industrial revolution and continued in the electronics revolution and now the information age and soon the revolution to be brought on as technology penetrates down to the nano level of manipulation. I love science & industry and all the new tools that spin out of basic research and new technology - it's a continuing grand adventure and I believe we will witness what seem to be modern day miracles in all areas of experience - BUT - imo, there are areas of research and ways or knowing that we haven't even begun to explore, and if my deep seated suspicions are anywhere near correct, it will be developments and advancements that occur in this direction that may be the most important for our future and lend us the power to go beyond the limits imposed by our current and future science for good ends. To me, "Love" can be looked at as a kind of force, from a pragmatic point of view, for the sake of this discussion only, because I know it sound silly describing love in this way, but nonetheless, I believe real love, as realized and created between two people, when steady and true, and other forms of a more generalized love, that perhaps we aren't even familiar with, is the gateway to a new technology that is multi-potential and maybe even infinite (eventually) in its ability to effect change in the so called "real" world - so that those who hearts are truly loving and properly oriented with synchronicity of purpose, have abilities to act on the world not from the outside but from underneath it, coming up from the common wellspring of all that is material, molecular, atomic, subatomic (quantum), quark patterned & string arrayed, finding the pathway up, up and up from such depths in reverse direction and thus into our objective surface reality. If it were possible to influence the world from that direction, underneath it all, then ANYTHING would be possible, and imo it is Love that is the force, the Key to unlocking the doorway to this most fundamental and deepest undifferentiated aspect of human travel and experience. Love then is the key to getting to the answers to all questions, problems and inquiries. We will continue to explore everything out here as normal, it's just that we will also be able to explore and discover and effect change from in here as well. This to me is the next evolutionary step for our society, our civilization and our species as a whole, and everyone will benefit.

Ok, now that i reread the above it's not the most coherent thing i ever wrote but there's revolutionary new thinking in there somewhere. i am VERY serious about the essence of what i was trying to say - i just need to outline it better. that all was "stream of conscious" kind of writing so i don't expect scholary types to get what i was trying to say - but if you do, and you're a woman 'of age' - i just might wanna marry you! LOL!!! (so you could explain to me what i'm trying to say and do!)

Mr Anderton ...
I like what you wrote ... made much sense to me. Was a stream of consciousness kinda chic before becoming corrupted by academia! (j/k to all those in academia land 😉 ).

I would argue tho, that what you talk about is already happening and has been for aeons ... it's just that coming from within to without there is distortion. And the challenge is not to get the inner love out but to get it out without distortion. does this make sense?

i wont bother to quote ur amazing long 'stream of conscious' as u called it! but - are u saying that u believe in innate ideas that we only come to realise through experiences? and that love is the force which allows us to experience these 'revelations' within ourselves rather than through the outside world? Or did i read it all twice and completely miss the point?!

John interesting read...and yes I've read much about some science research in the quantum fields....The more they explore this field, the more we will know...It seems the research that has been done can open many doors up to our consciousness and thinking...ie things invisible to most of us...Kinda goes along with some Metaphysics and would change most Religions as we know it.

For now the idea of "good" for me cannot really be explain throughly, but it's more a felt thing....kinda simple actually...if you do something good from an unconditional type way, then it makes you FEEL good....and it has a chain reaction to it that spreads like waves...

Yes, and it, 'Goodness', has a lasting quality that stays with you always and is something no one can ever take from you no matter what. I know what you mean debbiejo.

Originally posted by StrangeDays
Mr Anderton ...
I like what you wrote ... made much sense to me. Was a stream of consciousness kinda chic before becoming corrupted by academia! (j/k to all those in academia land 😉 ).

I would argue tho, that what you talk about is already happening and has been for aeons ... it's just that coming from within to without there is distortion. And the challenge is not to get the inner love out but to get it out without distortion. does this make sense?

I'm thinkin' bout this now. Pretty deep. . . Give me a little bit to think - gotta get something to eat 1st too! Hmmm . . . 🙂

There is nothing that is actually the question is "Do people what they think is best for them" then yes I 'd agree...anything else...nope..no. "good", so if

😕 😮

Originally posted by jOHN_Anderton
Yes, and it, 'Goodness', has a lasting quality that stays with you always and is something no one can ever take from you no matter what. I know what you mean debbiejo.

Thanks....To me goodness is a good feeling...It makes you feel good...and if for some reason, it doesn't then it's self serving...meaning you are either pleasing yourself, or you're letting someone else dictate to you what good or right is...Most people live in the latter...they want to please others and deny themselves their own selves....destructive actually...destructive to yourself....Mainly taught by religions....For me, I think people should always live what their truth is about them self in a nondestructive way...

Originally posted by Biscuit
i wont bother to quote ur amazing long 'stream of conscious' as u called it! but - are u saying that u believe in innate ideas that we only come to realise through experiences? and that love is the force which allows us to experience these 'revelations' within ourselves rather than through the outside world? Or did i read it all twice and completely miss the point?!

Thank you for you comment too! You are all so smart in this thread! Okay, got to eat 1st to get my synapses firing again. Btw, I'm not an academically schooled "philosopher", as you can probly tell. i just have some ideas that I'm sure come accross unformed or even as old news to you more learned - but thiy're new to me and are mor feeling-based than reasoned. I actually am in foreign territory in the always fascinating world of Philosophy, a discipline that the ancients used to refer to as the "Sophia" or repository for the highest form of thought and reasoning, the guradian of ultimate Truth. I actually have a degree in the sciences, biochemistry and a minor in analytical chemistry to be exact, but try to keep up to date in other area's and certainly on whats happening at both frontier's - the cosmologic and the quantum ends of creation, so to speak. 🙂 There's so much happening now, our knowledge is advancing so rapidly not only in the physical and chemical and biological sciences but in the evolving ideas coming out of philosophy, the humanities and even metaphysics, that its is hard to put it all together sometimes. It's like you can just feel the energy of some grand unified field theory thats about to happen. Like a tsunami of Knowledge is about to break upon the beachhead of academia and change it all in some fundamental way!

*puts on white coat and leaves thread before the snickering begins by those who are much more learned in these things than jA will ever be . . . back into the laboratory where I belong and am most comfortable!*

well u sound more clued up than me - must just be the big words!

Well big words need not be used then, if it's confusing to some....Layman's terms would do much better to cluing one in.

here here to that debbiejo!!
If there is one thing I have learnt it is that academia land complicates things a lot more than necessary. But, it serves a purpose, which to save a huge ramble I am not going to go into here.

I don't really think that any one is any more clued up than any one else. Just 'clued up' in different ways if you like. Just when you think you get it a 3 year old child will say something that will land you promptly back on your bum!!

I reckon if we go around with the attitude that everyone has something interesting and worthwhile to say then ... life, people and the world is exciting and interesting and there is always something new to learn.

But knowledge can also be subjective. Some say we don't learn anything new ... we just remember stuff we are innately aware of already.

I like the idea of that, it means im clever 🙂 then again i have a very bad memory - bugger 🙁

😆

Originally posted by StrangeDays
Mr Anderton ...
I like what you wrote ... made much sense to me. Was a stream of consciousness kinda chic before becoming corrupted by academia! (j/k to all those in academia land 😉 ).

Oh yeah? Hmmm, now you're getting quite mysterious. 😉

Originally posted by StrangeDays
I would argue tho, that what you talk about is already happening and has been for aeons ... it's just that coming from within to without there is distortion. And the challenge is not to get the inner love out but to get it out without distortion. does this make sense?

Believe it or not, YES, that does make sense. It would have to be coming out, yes, in all sentient beings to SOME extent, and the more aware, the greater their expression of love, or at least the greater the possibility for expression of love. Of course Humans on earth would have the greatest self-awareness and therefore become the vehicle through which the expression of love holds the highest promise. Of course that doesn't preclude higher love harmonics, if you will, in other species of life from elsewhere in our own galaxy and other galaxies too. I mean, after all, there's 100's of billions of other stars in the Milky Way that could possibly serve as "suns" for other planetary systems, some of which are bound to harbor intelligent life. Moreover, there are literally 100's of billions of other GALAXIES throughout the entire universe with one estimate at ~ 500 billion.

Wow, got way off topic. I need a break now - splitting headache!