Questions about Saw 2

Started by papabeard4 pages

It was so obvious that she was involved and most of the traps if not all were related to her.

She was a drug addict and their was a pit of needles

She cut her wrists and the girl got her hands stuck in the box with the razors that cut her wrists.

I think there was some reference to her burning all her friends and that guy was burned in the furnace.

Cant remember the rest, will have to see it again

Originally posted by jayy
It was WAY BETTER than the first SAW. Everyone here agrees. The End.

I prefered the first film , way more mystery and suspense, this was just a bigger budget pointless c@ck fest. Only made to cash in on the success of the first.

well, as I've said a million times, I prefer the second

i like the second because the kills are much better

The kills may have been better, but that doesnt make up for a crappy story.

Part 1 is the superior.

I agree that Saw pt one is the superior, but thats not saying much. IMO.

The acting was way better in Saw II. Of course, Saw is how it all began, and I really liked its plot, but the actors just killed it...literally.

Can't argue there. LOL.

seriously dude, glad you agree

Anyone who disagrees needs help! LOL

lol

Saw was about the story, and it completely beat Saw 2 storywise. Saw 2 just turned into a generic maniac-chasing-everyone-with-a-knife film. It was good film, no doubts, but the story lacked depth, and the trap games were too basic and predictable. Hardly any character development, unlike the first.

hey wait, what would have lied beyond that door that they never got to... from the part that Amanda had to find the key in the needle pit? was it their exit?

Yeah, Jigsaw said on the tape if he unlocked the door, they could be free.

Saw II was better than Saw I. End of story.

oh, I don't remember that part where he says thats the exit, I just remember him saying something like, oh I dunno, nevermind, lol

Hmm.............end of story?? Not without a discussion. At least thats what I think.

Originally posted by jayy
Saw II was better than Saw I. End of story.

^^ Look up and read my post. Surely you could do the same and actually give reasons why you think it is better.

Ive ever there was a film based on human stupidity it would be that....

The first one pissed me off with the ending "Oh I did it cause I'm dying..."

The second one pissed me off with the idiots in the house who just refuse to talk or help each other... if they spent 5 mins looking at things they would of realised the obvious traps and seen the solutions....

1) the bladed box... Solution... use one hand to hold the blades up the other to reach in....
2) the room with syringes... oh the door won't open.. How about we look around... OH LOOK a wire.. wonder if thats gonner do something good!
3) the furance... shine a torch around.. and you would of seen that the flames would of come on... then you could of realised that there was a way to turn them off....

all there problems came from there inablitiy to work to gether and there refusal to spend a few mins looking at the problem....