Don't call me Jedi biased. I argued against them for what was easily 150,000 characters against Nai.
You've argued for the jedi every time they have numerical superiority, despite the fact that they can't play as a good team for shit.
They were outnumbered 5,000 to one in an open field. The Geonosians also beought in heavy weapons that couldn't not be deflected by a saber(a sonic canon took out two Jedi in one shot).
The point was that they were stupid and exposed themselves in infiltrating the arena. This scenario assumes they are trying to infiltrate the Trayus Academy, the Sith home base. They would get slaughtered. The jedi were remarkable failures.
And I doubt it was 5,000 to one. Show me this figure from an official source please.
They obviously can't feed on all of it, or even half, or else the Exile couldn't have defeated them. Remember that the Exile defeated then by himself after he had gotten his force presence back by defeat Nihilus.
They don't feed from it per se; they grow in power because of it. More jedi = more power to grow from. So even if they feed half of that power, they're being empowered to the point of a hundred average jedi on top of their own powers. Pretty impressive.
How are these Sith invisible? I seem to remember them having to de-cloak before they could attack.
Not true. They killed the entire crew of the Harbinger while undetected. Also, they DO attack your party while cloaked, and become visible when you fight back.
Also, that statement you made about Malak is borderline fanboy. Uber powers? He was defeated by Revan at minimum twice even even with the power of the Star Forge.
Oh my god, Glentract... please, stop trying to piss me off already. When have I ever been a Malak fanboy? Ever? When have I ever gone off and been totally, totally over the top with no evidence to support my cause? Never. That's right. So please, stow that "borderline fanboy" crap.
Malak >>> All but two jedi on Geonosis. This is evident. The fact that he easily eliminates the two jedi who were resourceful and powerful enough to make it as far as they did in the Star Forge (Which is farther and faster than Revan's whole team) shows he has good control of the Force. Bastila, whom you argued would be better than Bandon, was frozen in place by Malak while Malak dueled Revan for the first time onboard the Leviathan. Malak -has- power. This is evident, not fanboyism.
Second, Revan is better than Malak. This is also evident. Revan was more or less undisputed master over Malak and Malak never sought to strike Revan down. Revan > Malak. Evident.
The Jedi have sparred a lot though.
Yes, but nowhere like they would forty years after the Sith Wars, back when Jedi were more than mere stewards of a Republic that (As is the case in the PT) haven't seen major Sith action for a thousand years. Today, people aren't exactly great at sword to sword fighting either, because there is little to no use for it, period.
KOTOR Jedi rarely fought lightsaber-wielding-Sith either, yet we saw Jedi fighting through the Star Forge faster than Revan did.(The one's who got to Malak before you.)
They rarely fought lightsaber wielding Sith, huh? Is that why the jedi were killed or turned to the dark side by legions of... Sith? If you want to look at the numbers of Sith in the games as evidence of at the very least numbers of Sith in that era (Or even dark jedi) the ratio is very good that the two DID clash. Saying otherwise is ridiculous.
Also, note Obi-wan in TPM defeating a DLOS. Note Mace defeating one. Neither had ever fought against one before, yet they defeated them.
Obi-Wan was -lucky- to win the battle as he did. Second, Mace is the second best jedi in the line up. Bad sampling. Now if Bultar Swan killed Sith, I would be impressed.