Originally posted by Bardock42
I agree with the overarching point, but the one specific post was silly in the way that my hyperbolic Bulls comparison mocked.
My point about how a team that completely relied on one player to make sure they didn't concede any goals, mock-ups from the referee and sheer luck is not deserving of being in a contest that is supposed to determine which of two teams is the best in the World? Especially in a World Cup where other teams who were maybe more deserving were eliminated do to similar shoddy refereeing? 🙂
I don't see how your Bulls-comparison works on any level. I understand what you were trying to do/say, your comparison whether it was hyperbolic or not, is not applicable. 🙂