Kansas School Boards Approves "Intelligent Design" Theory in Science Textbooks

No PVC is better. 😆

LOL..that Candle in the Wind play was excellent. A fitting metaphore for Whob's argument.

The quickness of everyone on here to criticize whob makes me wonder if the same would happen were his views on evolution and Intelligent Design reversed.

if equally irrational and idiotic, YES.
who would want a ranting lying fool to be an ambassabor to their cause?

Originally posted by FeceMan
The quickness of everyone on here to criticize whob makes me wonder if the same would happen were his views on evolution and Intelligent Design reversed.

I think the negative response is more due how to the arguement was presented, along with the behaviour that followed, more so than his belief system.

Originally posted by FeceMan
The quickness of everyone on here to criticize whob makes me wonder if the same would happen were his views on evolution and Intelligent Design reversed.

I can't really add to what everyone else has said. But, I don't respect the opinion that santa claus floated down six thousand years ago and created the world...and deny the clear existance of facts. I don't respect the opinion that science and faith are indivisible. However, I do respect people's right to that opinion. But, it isn't opinion whob is presenting: it's lies.

Beyond the argument that has taken place here, it is a matter of presenting faith based ideals in a science class. As I said a long time ago, in this very thread; should you be of the opinion that ID should be included in science textbooks, argue to change the definition of science, not the definition of evolution or Intelligent Design.

Sometimes it's a lot more interesting--and peaceful, for that matter--when merely observing an argument and not getting involved. This is one of those times 🙂.

You did see what I wrote about the whole 'burning in hell' bit, didn't you, PBS? (Ooooh...zing 😉.)

Fin.

Excellent retort and defence of your actions. (by the way, that was sarcasm)

I have a better one...

Is there much talk of the superiority of evolution on FOX news?

Kansas has just done one better: science has been redefined so as make supernatural explanations seem "more natural." It was in today's papers.

Paradoxically, this not only proves God's existence but that He has a sense of humor.

Originally posted by Mindship
Kansas has just done one better: science has been redefined so as make supernatural explanations seem "more natural." It was in today's papers.

Paradoxically, this not only proves God's existence but that He has a sense of humor.

I am hoping this is a joke. I really am.

Originally posted by whobdamandog

Fin.

👇 Weak.

People agreeing on something doesn't mean they're committing group-think. Just a stupid buzzword you like throwing around improperly.

Originally posted by BackFire
👇 Weak.

People agreeing on something doesn't mean they're committing group-think. Just a stupid buzzword you like throwing around improperly.

That's easier then actually explaining yourself though. By grouping everyone together you don't have to acknowledge their points because "all they are doing is ganging up on you plus if at least one person laughs at it you can say that you "owned" or "burned" everyone.

And if one person doesn't laugh, you can always laugh at your own jokes and say "owned" and "burned".

Originally posted by BackFire
And if one person doesn't laugh, you can always laugh at your own jokes and say "owned" and "burned".

Awe, the self proclaimed "burn" or "Owned". Truely a weapon who's awesome power is displayed in this forum with great frequency.

Originally posted by whobdamandog

How ironic that a conservative Christian - is there any other kind!?!? - is calling a bunch of people 'Fox News watchers'!!! Obviously another example of someone not fully comprehending the world in which they live...

Originally posted by whobdamandog

Fin.

Your think.