Originally posted by hotsauce6548
Don't worry. I'm a doctor, so I see this a lot.Dictionaries can help with spelling, but so can Spell Checks on computers.
Good luck. 😊
Originally posted by FistOfThe North
Radcliff blows harder than a big old sick fat man's, pimpled and warted arse, loudly passing gas for 1 minute straight, while sitting down after eating 3 deep fried Jumbo chilli cheese dogs with oily fried eggs, beans with extra tabasco sause, salt and vinager chips and a half gallon of tap water lemonade with a half gallon of peanut butter pumpkin and raisen ice cream cake with chocolate apple pudding filling for dessert to go with it.
Radcliffe Is 'Ok', But Yeah, His Crying Bit After Cedric Died Was....."Eh".
I Just Hate His Rambid Girl Fans. Not Him. 🙂
Originally posted by harrysahottie
I he's done several professional jobs and therefore qualifies as an actor. do i detect a hint of jealousy somewhere perhaps?
Jealous? No... i think Emma and Rupert are really good actors but Dan
brings them down. He was good in David copperfield but all he had to do was look cute and pathetic. He is an actor...just not a very good one.
I think he's done reasonably well with the role of Harry, and handled all of the baggage that comes with such a high profile job. I think he has grown and matured with the part and made it his own. I am, however, reluctant to call him a good actor based on one role. Part of being a good actor is versatility, and since I haven't seen him in anything else, how do I know he has it? In my opinion, he will probably be type-cast for life, and his career will flop after HP 7.
Originally posted by MistressofSnape
His father is the producer? Didn't knw that. He seriously did mess up that scene, though. He's a really bad cryer . Even I could do better than that.
yeah he kind of did mess up that scene, like there were no sign of like sadness or tears, but i think he really well in this film. I think hes come along way from the 1st movie.
It doesn't matter if he's a good actor or not. What REALLY matters is that he's the richest teenager in the friggin country of Britain.
You can plead the case of good acting over bad acting but what really matters is if you actually get the job of an actor. And nice lump of cash.
It's typical of many "good" actor extremists to hate celebrities because they're not getting any work and they're working 20 something a week at a coffee shop.
Originally posted by zombieman
I think he's done reasonably well with the role of Harry, and handled all of the baggage that comes with such a high profile job. I think he has grown and matured with the part and made it his own. I am, however, reluctant to call him a good actor based on one role. Part of being a good actor is versatility, and since I haven't seen him in anything else, how do I know he has it? In my opinion, he will probably be type-cast for life, and his career will flop after HP 7.
He stars in this movie called December Boys. It comes out sometime...I don't know when. I saw it on Mugglenet. You got a good point. His career will probuly go downhill after Harry Potter. Just like J.K Rowling probuly won't right another book after Harry Potter is over. Good things never last long. 🙁
I know loads of people have said this before:
Harry is not a good actor...he is just divinely hotdrooliowhen he doesn't act. I don't think his acting improved. He's good in narration... Nothing more... As for facial expressions, emotional scenes etc...E. Watson, R. Grint and T. Felton win it all...!
I totally wish they could change Daniel... >> But that would be too awkward since for the past 4 movies... Dan was casted as Harry.
Originally posted by Saratn
Personally if the kid can't cry good without smiling, then he ain't so good of an actor. it's called an acting class where you get taught how to use your emottions...to take something tragic from your past, and pretend it is that, having that image clear in your mind...
Spoiler:
You were adopted