Reed Richards v The Phoenix of the White Crown

Originally posted by Laminator_X
Really, how interesting. Who wrote that story? The occasional PF appearances in DC (and elsewhere?) intrigue me. It was fairly strongly implied that Cascade from Sovereign Seven's mother, the Maitresse, was in some fashion a Pheonix avatar. Of course, Claremont wrote that book for DC. It also had unnamed cameos from Kitty, Illiana, Lockheed, Logan, and the nonsensically named National Public Radio Television news crew (Neal & Manoli are real people!).

I don't remember her going into the Source in titans/Xmen 🙂

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
I don't remember her going into the Source in titans/Xmen 🙂

Thats cool, cos i do:

😄

You've got the issue you knew she did you lying b*stard 😂

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Thats cool, cos i do:

😄

You've got the issue you knew she did you lying b*stard 😂

actually I had forgotten I have not read it for years - despite having it in collection form as well these days, it was such a shit story best forgotten. Of course you have to realise highfather and gogs power also comes from there so it means little. Superman has breached the wall.

..........nuff' said

Originally posted by Ultimate Rage
..........nuff' said

😂

🙂

so then that story is a shit story but the one with reed isn't? whatever you say this a reed vs phoenix, whatever he and the rabbit monster did was a one time thing, i'd love to seem him stretch out of the hands of the phoenix once she holds the universe he and the rabbit "created" in her hands

Originally posted by LordKaos
so then that story is a shit story but the one with reed isn't? whatever you say this a reed vs phoenix, whatever he and the rabbit monster did was a one time thing, i'd love to seem him stretch out of the hands of the phoenix once she holds the universe he and the rabbit "created" in her hands

yeah its crossover they are not cannon read the forum rules - and of course making the 616 universe was a one time thing 😕 your point is 🙂

Originally posted by LordKaos
so then that story is a shit story but the one with reed isn't? whatever you say this a reed vs phoenix, whatever he and the rabbit monster did was a one time thing, i'd love to seem him stretch out of the hands of the phoenix once she holds the universe he and the rabbit "created" in her hands

You tell him!!! 😉

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
You tell him!!! 😉

yup one of your "respected" MEMBERS 😂

he and sentry make a good team 🙂

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
yeah its crossover they are not cannon read the forum rules

However as ive made quite clear in the thread about Phoenixes connection with God thread over in the comic book forum there is a connection between them and this crossover was just another example of the writers highlighting that to us. 😉

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
yup one of your "respected" MEMBERS 😂

he and sentry make a good team 🙂

So anyone who supports me and disagrees with you isnt credible? 😕

If thats your viewpoint then you have a lot to learn my friend. 😮 🙁

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
However as ive made quite clear in the thread about Phoenixes connection with God thread over in the comic book forum there is a connection between them and this crossover was just another example of the writers highlighting that to us. 😉

clear to you and it was Claremont Phoenix is retconned out the rabbit is in now🙂

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
So anyone who supports me and disagrees with you isnt credible? 😕

If thats your viewpoint then you have a lot to learn my friend. 😮 🙁

Of course Adam Warlock is credible his incredible check out his thread to post ratio its awesome.

and Lord "Kaos" is credible, his name indicates that 🙂

can you spel Kab....... 🙂

hi!whati s this forum about?

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
clear to you and it was Claremont Phoenix is retconned out the rabbit is in now🙂

How so? Where does it say that the Big Bang wasnt a manifestation of Phoenix? Bearing in mind all other accounts state the Big Bang to be just that it would have to say that for there to be a retcon.

It would also have to state that Eternity wasnt created by Phoenix and that Galactus wasnt transformed into who he is by Phoenix.

Where does it say that in the comic you havent read? 🙄

Stop trying to debate over something you have no knowledge on.

Your opinion is based on KG's apparent misinterpretation and a few out of context scans.

I posted some more scans from the issue which show evidence conflicting with your opinion yet youre ignoring them.

Give it up. You had a good run but i came back and settled it. 😄

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
Of course Adam Warlock is credible his incredible check out his thread to post ratio its awesome.

and Lord "Kaos" is credible, his name indicates that 🙂

can you spel Kab....... 🙂

Well I'm convinced Whirly, you're Space Rabbit makes much more sense than these other peoples ideas. They just seem to use childish rhetoric. Your posts and Pictures are much clearer.

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat

can you spel Kab....... 🙂

You missed me so much didnt you? 😉

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
How so? Where does it say that the Big Bang wasnt a manifestation of Phoenix? Bearing in mind all other accounts state the Big Bang to be just that it would have to say that for there to be a retcon.

It would also have to state that Eternity wasnt created by Phoenix and that Galactus wasnt transformed into who he is by Phoenix.

Where does it say that in the comic you havent read? 🙄

Stop trying to debate over something you have no knowledge on.

Your opinion is based on KG's apparent misinterpretation and a few out of context scans.

I posted some more scans from the issue which show evidence conflicting with your opinion yet youre ignoring them.

Give it up. You had a good run but i came back and settled it. 😄

Only convinced new members and Adam Warlock have you read back this thread 🙂

Originally posted by Evil Genius
Well I'm convinced Whirly, you're Space Rabbit makes much more sense than these other peoples ideas. They just seem to use childish rhetoric. Your posts and Pictures are much clearer.

Whirly hasnt read the comic by his own admission. His ideas are KG's ideas which my scans have just totally discredited. I suggest you have a re-read so you can re-consider your stance.

Originally posted by GalacticStorm
Whirly hasnt read the comic by his own admission. His ideas are KG's ideas which my scans have just totally discredited. I suggest you have a re-read so you can re-consider your stance.

Your ideas are arrogant and stupid I have read them, they are the worst kind of conceit, Whirly makes much more sense