why do people think mace is stronger than Yoda?

Originally posted by Captain REX
What is with you and saying someone's been reading SS? If you actually read SS, you'd know what is on there that is bullshit.

rephrase that, it sound offensive

Oh no. I am offended. *drops dead from shock of the blunt and offensive lexis*

no. seriously. rephrase it.

Originally posted by exanda kane
Oh no. I am offended. *drops dead from shock of the blunt and offensive lexis*

lol.

Originally posted by calvin44
rephrase that, it sound offensive

It could be meant to be a little offensive, you know...

Let me break it down.

You keep saying that whatever I say came from Supershadow. I am saying that that is impossible, and that if you read what is on SS, you would know that what I am saying is not on that website, and that the stuff on SS is bullshit, which is what I am NOT posting.

Tada.

...

Got it?

Meanwhile, my personal opinion on Vaapad stands.

so does mine young padawan, so does mine.

He's a moderator, you know.

You agreed with me, after all. 😉

i know.

So no-one thinks Mace is more powerful?

Still powerful is a vague term. Yoda is 900 years old or so. Mace is apparently 50-something and they are virtually at the same level. Iuno. I've lost the will to show people that there isnt much of a difference between them both...

From what I observed, Yoda is more powerful in the force itself. If Mace Windu and Yoda got into a Tk shoving match, Yoda wins.

Mace, by virute of his body type and skill, is better as an actual swordsman, then both Sideous and Yoda (though I've argued against it before, I"ve since resigned myself to believe that Mace won. I do think Palpatine let himself get blasted in the face afterwards though). So mace could probably beat Yoda in a out and out sabre fight, but in a antyhing goes fight, like what Yoda and Sideous got into I belive Yoda would win. Of course it's all hypothetical, but I would say in swordplay Mace is better then yoda.

Originally posted by InsaneNoodlyGuy
From what I observed, Yoda is more powerful in the force itself. If Mace Windu and Yoda got into a Tk shoving match, Yoda wins.

Mace, by virute of his body type and skill, is better as an actual swordsman, then both Sideous and Yoda (though I've argued against it before, I"ve since resigned myself to believe that Mace won. I do think Palpatine let himself get blasted in the face afterwards though). So mace could probably beat Yoda in a out and out sabre fight, but in a antyhing goes fight, like what Yoda and Sideous got into I belive Yoda would win. Of course it's all hypothetical, but I would say in swordplay Mace is better then yoda.

agreed.

Originally posted by InsaneNoodlyGuy
From what I observed, Yoda is more powerful in the force itself. If Mace Windu and Yoda got into a Tk shoving match, Yoda wins.

Mace, by virute of his body type and skill, is better as an actual swordsman, then both Sideous and Yoda (though I've argued against it before, I"ve since resigned myself to believe that Mace won. I do think Palpatine let himself get blasted in the face afterwards though). So mace could probably beat Yoda in a out and out sabre fight, but in a antyhing goes fight, like what Yoda and Sideous got into I belive Yoda would win. Of course it's all hypothetical, but I would say in swordplay Mace is better then yoda.

yoda puts more emphasis on the force itself, while mace puts more emphasis into the character/skill of the user.
i agree with what you said.

Originally posted by exanda kane
Still powerful is a vague term. Yoda is 900 years old or so. Mace is apparently 50-something and they are virtually at the same level. Iuno. I've lost the will to show people that there isnt much of a difference between them both...

Something like that.