Poll
100%
0%
I'm sorry but completly wrong.
First, Duke Nukem is not an ID Software game.
Second, Sierra is a publisher and not an developer, so they didnt make the games, just put them on the shelves.
Third, there is nothing wrong with run and gun gameplay(even though Doom 3, Return to Castle Wolf are not run and gun.
If I had to chose as the best FPS developer in the industry as of right now, I would pick Valve (can you tell), based on the fact that both HL's have been successful and labelled as the best games of all time (HL1 is the best game of all time).
ID has started the whole genre, and deserve alot of respect but lately, their games have been good but great.
Jesus mother fvkcing christ can't you people lay off for oucne....
okay, sorry abotu Duke Nukem, Unlike every other person I didn'T play it today, yesterday, or in the last year or so. I always remebered the ID logo at start up, but no its 3D Realms RIGHT?
Sierra publishes games, YES, they are acociated with the people who makes the games YES, So I don't see the problem here. NEVER did I say they made them, BUT theya re published with its name.
And I did say "MOSTLY", beacsue i knew some people would hastly point out that the latter Wolf and DooM games are NOT run and gun.
BUT, Run and gun had its place at the begeing when things where comming out,a nd now with the new engins and power we have, we can add story elements and depth to the games. Even thought the latter Wolf and Doom games are NOT run and Gun, They still have there origins from them.
Originally posted by Mišt
I dont like run and gun games too much, good for lan parties and online, but meh for singleplayer...I prefer the realistic 'take your time or get your ass owned' games.
/agree
although I have to say...iD feels lacking in magic after q3.. their new games just dont have that... funk.. o_O.... I especially loved insta-unlagged q3... when you rail someone in the air the announcer goes "Holy S**t!".. so much attitude put into that game.. I hope maybe quake 5 is a true successor to the q3 arena throne
and yes, for single player.. half life 2 is a must..
as for sierra.. they usually pick innovative first person shooters for publishing.. so usually I trust their judgement unless I read a bad review
Originally posted by Koala MeatPie
Jesus mother fvkcing christ can't you people lay off for oucne....okay, sorry abotu Duke Nukem, Unlike every other person I didn'T play it today, yesterday, or in the last year or so. I always remebered the ID logo at start up, but no its 3D Realms RIGHT?
Sierra publishes games, YES, they are acociated with the people who makes the games YES, So I don't see the problem here. NEVER did I say they made them, BUT theya re published with its name.
And I did say "MOSTLY", beacsue i knew some people would hastly point out that the latter Wolf and DooM games are NOT run and gun.
BUT, Run and gun had its place at the begeing when things where comming out,a nd now with the new engins and power we have, we can add story elements and depth to the games. Even thought the latter Wolf and Doom games are NOT run and Gun, They still have there origins from them.
Oh, cry me a river.
You say something wrong, what do you expect?
Sats does have a point. Seirra generally publishes good FPS, but you cant compare a developing firm to an publisher. Sierra has no part in making the game, they just allocate funds for the game. ALso, Half Life 1 was publish by them, but not HL2.