Solid Snake vs Sam Fisher (no weapon)

Started by kamikz3 pages

Lol, why are you saying that? Because I replyed and you couldent give me a decent answere?

Splinter Cell is more realistic then Metal Gear

Originally posted by CaptainBen
Splinter Cell is more realistic then Metal Gear

Hehe, really...... That's just why Sam wears bright glowing goggles that can be seen all the way to china. And yet none of the gaurds notice it 😆

Lol yeah. And how does being more realistic help Sam in this fight?

It doesn't..... If anything it only hurts him.

Exactly. Sam is way out of his leage here. He's a master of sneaking, but that's probably the only thing that he can match Snake in.

Yeah no kidding, I don't know where people get off saying he's a master in hand to hand combat..

Snake has trained in CQC. He would brake his jaw in 1 punch or kick.

yes snake has amazing skill kicking ocelots units ass without a weapon i couldnt see sam fisher doing that in a turtles life time

Snake would win completely, Sam might have a bit more slim stealth skills but in a hand-to-hand fight with Snake he'll get owned like hell. Sam has problems taking down 2 average security guards in a police station lol, and Snake takes down an Metal Gear lol. (And guys this is referring to Solid Snake (MG1, MG2, MGS1, MGS2. Not Big Boss from MGS3)

and that guy said "he relies on guns" if he has actually played metal gear solid that's obviously wrong... snake uses guns because he can... its sam who relies on guns... and not only guns but "the dark".

Originally posted by Gun
Dude sam fisher would kick his ass. Snake relies on guns to much

LMAO. Nice debating here.
"But Snik sux, Sam Fiser is old, he winz". Seriousley, Snake kicks his ass, hard. And I even doubt Sam is beyond Snake in stealth too.

The fact is that Sam Fisher is a more realistic character, while Snake lives in a world where people have superpowers and such. There is no way that Sam could win this.

Snake. SC is more based on reality, MGS is just loosely based on it and the people can go beyond normal human abilities.....such as the case for snake.

If it's inside a pitch black building with hundreds of corridors, Sam Fisher wins 7/10.

But if it's a straight up fight, out in the open, or even inside the vents of a police station, Sam loses 10/10. I tried fighting an ordinary guard in in Splinter Cell, and was dead within 5 seconds.

Well snake wins this but while on Splinter Cell playing online my team mate was killed and had the certain amount of time I could revive him and I managed to kill 3 guys 10 seconds flat.

I go with Snake, Sam is no mach for him....

Originally posted by Dark-Kenshin
If it's inside a pitch black building with hundreds of corridors, Sam Fisher wins 7/10.

not really, snake can just use his nv or ir googles to make him visible.

Snake would beat him in a matter of seconds

I would say that Snakew would win in hand to hand combat, but I still think that Splinter Cell is a better game. I mean you can go through the entire game without firing a single bullet if you want to. His stealth skills are unmatched by anyone. I do agree that Snake has better hand to hand combat skills though. Plus anyone who has read the Splinter Cell instruction manual knows that the night vision goggles and the light on his back are there so the player can see him because some people play with their brightness lower to get the full pitch black effect and it's impossible to see Sam which makes it pretty hard to grab someone from behind without bumping into him.