I think he is opting that a story from a book in film will never be as good as the ESB script.
I haven't read much SW literature (still I come here.. go figure) but from my experience you just can't compare a script to a book story of how it will be in a movie.
So I will agree that no EU story would be as great on screen as ESB is.
Xyz jedi is just a little weird..
Originally posted by overlord
I think he is opting that a story from a book in film will never be as good as the ESB script.I haven't read much SW literature (still I come here.. go figure) but from my experience you just can't compare a script to a book story of how it will be in a movie.
So I will agree that no EU story would be as great on screen as ESB is.Xyz jedi is just a little weird..
I totally agree with you there. There ae some ways to incorporate characteristics of books into movies, but mostly they just become cliché.
And I also agree with that about XYZ Jedi...wierd lil' guy he is.
It would seem almost pointless to "movieize" books set in between movies.
And if you analyze them closely enough, the Thrawn trilogy wouldn't make for a good movie. If you make ONE movie out of them, then it'll seem rushed, any more than that and you'll thin the storyline.
The NJO would take MORE than a trilogy to make, and by that time, SW would be boring.
There isn't a book that revolves around Han Solo's lifetime that can be made into as good as a movie as any OT film. Maybe one concerning the Ancient Sith would be, maybe.