Why even bother? Everyone on this thread knows that you are the prototypical ‘fanboy,’ and not in a good way. In essence Wolverine is the be all end all for you when it comes to comic characters, and consequently you say things about him that are simply bogus.
In a nutshell: Wolverine is not as good as you claim he is.
And now you start a thread pitting Wolverine against Nightwing.
Yet you are the same person that states (over and over and over ….ad infinitum) that Wolverine is more than a match for the Hulk (that whole ‘Wolverine has defeated the Hulk 14 times’ spiel of yours ….obviously tainted with spelling errors that would make a kindergartener turn catatonic).
You also claim that the clawed one is a worthy adversary for Thor, just a couple of days ago you were claiming that he would win against Starfire (‘if she flew down’ …something she would never do).
I wouldn’t even be surprised if you thought Wolverine stood a chance against Superman, and who knows ….maybe you have even gone as far as saying that. I doubt it would surprise ANYONE on this forum if that was the case.
And now you start a thread pitting Wolverine against Nightwing!!!!!
Yet you are the same person who says Wolverine can give the Hulk a run for his money?!?
This is not a spite thread …..it is a bait thread.
You just want someone to come and say Nightwing would win, and then you will go off and start saying how Wolverine is this-n-that-n-whatnot!
BTW: In this particular fight Wolverine would win. That would be the most realistic eventuality. However Wolvie is not a match for most of the characters in comics (he is too uni-dimensional, is limited in the variety and range of his attacks, and for that matter is basically nothing more than a slugger with claws, enhanced abilities and a healing factor).
Hey ….if you want to start a bait thread it is all good, but you just look silly doing it since everyone knows your stand when it comes to Wolverine.
For the matter here is a picture that was made in your ‘honor’ ….LOL ….it is to be found in the Wolverine vs Teen Titans thread, but just for you I’ll place it here. I’m not sure who made it, but it basically sums up what a Wolverine fanboy (of which you are the epitome) is like.
Enjoy:
Wolverine vs TeenTitans thread: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t379783.html
And here is the picture of the Wolverine Fanboy. Even the spelling the dude is using looks 'very familiar.'
😆
Originally posted by spetznaz
Why even bother? Everyone on this thread knows that you are the prototypical ‘fanboy,’ and not in a good way. In essence Wolverine is the be all end all for you when it comes to comic characters, and consequently you say things about him that are simply bogus.
In a nutshell: Wolverine is not as good as you claim he is.
And now you start a thread pitting Wolverine against Nightwing.
Yet you are the same person that states (over and over and over ….ad infinitum) that Wolverine is more than a match for the Hulk (that whole ‘Wolverine has defeated the Hulk 14 times’ spiel of yours ….obviously tainted with spelling errors that would make a kindergartener turn catatonic).
You also claim that the clawed one is a worthy adversary for Thor, just a couple of days ago you were claiming that he would win against Starfire (‘if she flew down’ …something she would never do).
I wouldn’t even be surprised if you thought Wolverine stood a chance against Superman, and who knows ….maybe you have even gone as far as saying that. I doubt it would surprise ANYONE on this forum if that was the case.And now you start a thread pitting Wolverine against Nightwing!!!!!
Yet you are the same person who says Wolverine can give the Hulk a run for his money?!?This is not a spite thread …..it is a bait thread.
You just want someone to come and say Nightwing would win, and then you will go off and start saying how Wolverine is this-n-that-n-whatnot!BTW: In this particular fight Wolverine would win. That would be the most realistic eventuality. However Wolvie is not a match for most of the characters in comics (he is too uni-dimensional, is limited in the variety and range of his attacks, and for that matter is basically nothing more than a slugger with claws, enhanced abilities and a healing factor).
Hey ….if you want to start a bait thread it is all good, but you just look silly doing it since everyone knows your stand when it comes to Wolverine.
For the matter here is a picture that was made in your ‘honor’ ….LOL ….it is to be found in the Wolverine vs Teen Titans thread, but just for you I’ll place it here. I’m not sure who made it, but it basically sums up what a Wolverine fanboy (of which you are the epitome) is like.
Enjoy:Wolverine vs TeenTitans thread: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t379783.html
And here is the picture of the Wolverine Fanboy. Even the spelling the dude is using looks 'very familiar.'
😆
...Wow...
:😖niff:: I'm...I'm actually crying... 😮
spetznaz...that was beautiful. I don't think I've ever heard more incredible words than the ones you have so eloquently typed out.
You're my new best friend. I'm about to call my real best friend and tell him it's over.
Kudos, my friend. Kudos.
Originally posted by spetznaz
Why even bother? Everyone on this thread knows that you are the prototypical ‘fanboy,’ and not in a good way. In essence Wolverine is the be all end all for you when it comes to comic characters, and consequently you say things about him that are simply bogus.
In a nutshell: Wolverine is not as good as you claim he is.
And now you start a thread pitting Wolverine against Nightwing.
Yet you are the same person that states (over and over and over ….ad infinitum) that Wolverine is more than a match for the Hulk (that whole ‘Wolverine has defeated the Hulk 14 times’ spiel of yours ….obviously tainted with spelling errors that would make a kindergartener turn catatonic).
You also claim that the clawed one is a worthy adversary for Thor, just a couple of days ago you were claiming that he would win against Starfire (‘if she flew down’ …something she would never do).
I wouldn’t even be surprised if you thought Wolverine stood a chance against Superman, and who knows ….maybe you have even gone as far as saying that. I doubt it would surprise ANYONE on this forum if that was the case.And now you start a thread pitting Wolverine against Nightwing!!!!!
Yet you are the same person who says Wolverine can give the Hulk a run for his money?!?This is not a spite thread …..it is a bait thread.
You just want someone to come and say Nightwing would win, and then you will go off and start saying how Wolverine is this-n-that-n-whatnot!BTW: In this particular fight Wolverine would win. That would be the most realistic eventuality. However Wolvie is not a match for most of the characters in comics (he is too uni-dimensional, is limited in the variety and range of his attacks, and for that matter is basically nothing more than a slugger with claws, enhanced abilities and a healing factor).
Hey ….if you want to start a bait thread it is all good, but you just look silly doing it since everyone knows your stand when it comes to Wolverine.
For the matter here is a picture that was made in your ‘honor’ ….LOL ….it is to be found in the Wolverine vs Teen Titans thread, but just for you I’ll place it here. I’m not sure who made it, but it basically sums up what a Wolverine fanboy (of which you are the epitome) is like.
Enjoy:Wolverine vs TeenTitans thread: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t379783.html
And here is the picture of the Wolverine Fanboy. Even the spelling the dude is using looks 'very familiar.'
😆
The greatest thing about this post is not the spite, but the goddamned honest truth.
It's gotten out of control, and nothing short of telling people how it is, no matter how mean, will stop it.
Originally posted by Creshosk
You've got ad hominem down to an artform 🙄Any way, it's true this is loaded, since Wolverine probanly still has his adamantium and healing factor.
🙄
Originally posted by long pigNo, his facts don't have to be unbiased.
Ah, you know how I love your flair for words. 😄
For it to be truly ad hominem, Wolverine8888 would need to present a multitude of un-biased facts. He hasn't, so this isn't.
Though I'd like to know what the hell a biased or an unbiased fact is. . .
Though I'd like to know what the hell a biased or an unbiased fact is. . .
His facts are "tweaked" to fit his needs.
And, yes, he needs to present his case so that we can dismiss his case because he is a fanboy, even though his case is correct. That's when it's considered ad hominem.
Unfortunately, he hasn't done it.
Originally posted by long pigNot in the slightest.
Nice red herring. 😄 See, I can throw out thousand dollar phrases to make myself feel superior, too!His facts are "tweaked" to fit his needs.
And, yes, he needs to present his case so that we can dismiss his case because he is a fanboy, even though his case is correct. That's when it's considered ad hominem.
Unfortunately, he hasn't done it.
A debater commits the Ad Hominem Fallacy when he introduces irrelevant personal premisses about his opponent.
Understanable that you'd try to defend it. But I'm affraid that it doesn't require anything on his end.
Originally posted by Creshosk
Not in the slightest.A debater commits the Ad Hominem Fallacy when he introduces irrelevant personal premisses about his opponent.
Understanable that you'd try to defend it. But I'm affraid that it doesn't require anything on his end.
🙁 You didn't even comment on my Red Herring suggestion.
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
I don't think he actually has the capacity to do so intentionally, he's probably oblivious to the fact that he does so because he has a pathological affection for Wolverine.
Originally posted by long pigNo you can call insult someone without them presenting any kind of argument. No reaosn why you couldn't.
No, no. You'd have to put forth some sort of evidence before I could dismiss you as a fanboy and then someone could call Ad Hominem.
Originally posted by long pigLogic does not dictate human behavior.
Otherwise, there would be no reason to call it.
Originally posted by long pigWhy would I need to? it was off the topic of our off-topic discussion. and if you'd rather not discuss it I can happily oblige.
🙁 You didn't even comment on my Red Herring suggestion.
Originally posted by long pigI don't see anything either insulting or dissmisive in what X said. It could very well be true.
That's Ad Hominem.
Originally posted by long pigMeh, it may or may not be. I do treat almost anything from stormfront about Storm, or wolverine8888 about Wolverine with extensive scepticism, unless they can substantiate it with some sort of straightforward evidence, because for the most part they never do, or when I find the incident myself it's either been exaggerated completely out of proportion, been misinterpretted and misrepresented or never happened at all.
That's Ad Hominem.
No you can call insult someone without them presenting any kind of argument. No reaosn why you couldn't.
Logic does not dictate human behavior.
Why would you need to? it was off the topic of our off-topic discussion. and if you'd rather not discuss it I can happily oblige.
I don't see anything either insulting or dissmisive in what X said. It could very well be true.
And again, you're wrong.
Originally posted by long pigYou confirm my point and then say that I'm wrong, how . . odd . . .
Of course you COULD, but you'd be wrong. As you are here.
Originally posted by long pigWhat sort of emotion?
Are we acting off emotion here, then? Not very good to debate on emotion. You'll end up "believing" anything that suits your case.
Irritation? Anger?
I'm certainly not.
Originally posted by long pigOh, well, I'm not really a teacher so I'm not sure how to critique. As I said in the last post you were right. Which is why I didn't persue further so . . . good job? 🙂
I was asking as a critique, actually.
Originally posted by long pigDismissive to who?
Doesn't need to be insulting, just dismissive. Which it was.
Originally posted by long pigWould you like to provide evidence of your claims then? 😈
And again, you're wrong.
You confirm my point and then say that I'm wrong, how . . odd . . .
Oh, well, I'm not really a teacher so I'm not sure how to critique. As I said in the last post you were right. Which is why I didn't persue further so . . . good job? smile
Dismissive to who?
Would you like to provide evidence of your claims then? evil face
Originally posted by xmarksthespot
Meh, it may or may not be. I do treat almost anything from stormfront about Storm, or wolverine8888 about Wolverine with extensive scepticism, unless they can substantiate it with some sort of straightforward evidence, because for the most part they never do, or when I find the incident myself it's either been exaggerated completely out of proportion, been misinterpretted and misrepresented or never happened at all.
Originally posted by spetznaz
Why even bother? Everyone on this thread knows that you are the prototypical ‘fanboy,’ and not in a good way. In essence Wolverine is the be all end all for you when it comes to comic characters, and consequently you say things about him that are simply bogus.
In a nutshell: Wolverine is not as good as you claim he is.
And now you start a thread pitting Wolverine against Nightwing.
Yet you are the same person that states (over and over and over ….ad infinitum) that Wolverine is more than a match for the Hulk (that whole ‘Wolverine has defeated the Hulk 14 times’ spiel of yours ….obviously tainted with spelling errors that would make a kindergartener turn catatonic).
You also claim that the clawed one is a worthy adversary for Thor, just a couple of days ago you were claiming that he would win against Starfire (‘if she flew down’ …something she would never do).
I wouldn’t even be surprised if you thought Wolverine stood a chance against Superman, and who knows ….maybe you have even gone as far as saying that. I doubt it would surprise ANYONE on this forum if that was the case.And now you start a thread pitting Wolverine against Nightwing!!!!!
Yet you are the same person who says Wolverine can give the Hulk a run for his money?!?This is not a spite thread …..it is a bait thread.
You just want someone to come and say Nightwing would win, and then you will go off and start saying how Wolverine is this-n-that-n-whatnot!BTW: In this particular fight Wolverine would win. That would be the most realistic eventuality. However Wolvie is not a match for most of the characters in comics (he is too uni-dimensional, is limited in the variety and range of his attacks, and for that matter is basically nothing more than a slugger with claws, enhanced abilities and a healing factor).
Hey ….if you want to start a bait thread it is all good, but you just look silly doing it since everyone knows your stand when it comes to Wolverine.
For the matter here is a picture that was made in your ‘honor’ ….LOL ….it is to be found in the Wolverine vs Teen Titans thread, but just for you I’ll place it here. I’m not sure who made it, but it basically sums up what a Wolverine fanboy (of which you are the epitome) is like.
Enjoy:Wolverine vs TeenTitans thread: http://www.killermovies.com/forums/f77/t379783.html
And here is the picture of the Wolverine Fanboy. Even the spelling the dude is using looks 'very familiar.'
😆
everyone and i mean EVERYONE is biased at SOME point, so how about we just be adult about it and try to keep it to a minimum, but everyone has their inner fanboy, so all you are mi amigo is, a HYPOCRIT
Originally posted by long pigClearification?: do you mean me, you, or a general "your" which is ambivilous to either of the other two previously mentioned?
Correcting your errors isn't an insult, it's the foundation of any debate.
Originally posted by long pigI'm not, I was serious. I'm unqualified to critique that sort of thing. So I'm not sure what else to say.
Why so defensive?
Originally posted by long pigI still don't see anything that would dismiss QuadEight from X's statement about a pathological love of wolveirne.
To the person who is, by happenstance, the center of our discussion.
Originally posted by long pigamong other things.
Evidence that what X said fits with Ad Hominem's description?
Originally posted by long pigBit of a disconnect there. X got a little defensive when you called what he said Ad hominem, however the defensiveness doesn't mean that it was ad hominem or that X was wrong.
It's probably the most intelligent thing to do. There is always that exception to any rule.