Originally posted by roughriderIt's still a great movie.
Both has historical errors - you have to forgive these things sometimes in the name of narrative fiction - but Braveheart is one of the most historically inaccurate films ever made.Gladiator has stuck with me a bit more.
Spoiler:but the sad part about Wallace is that he
Both died
Spoiler:
didn't even win the war before said death, and things were looking pretty grim to begin with even before he got captured, whereas things were way more optimistic for Maximus, he achieved everything he wanted or needed to before his death. Also, IMHO, Wallace's death was WAY sadder.
It's easier to re-watch Gladiator because Mel Gibson has become such a distasteful human being, ever since his violent, racist rants to his wife got released to the public ten years ago. The vast majority of the public has never been able to look at him the same way again.
And he's an ultraconservative nutbar who gets worse every year.
Originally posted by roughrider
It's easier to re-watch Gladiator because Mel Gibson has become such a distasteful human being, ever since his violent, racist rants to his wife got released to the public ten years ago. The vast majority of the public has never been able to look at him the same way again.And he's an ultraconservative nutbar who gets worse every year.
Good poll.
I love both films. Actually just re-watched Gladiator a couple of days ago. I went with Gladiator, because it didn't go quite as over-the-top with adjusting history and making the hero such a mythical figure. Of course Gladiator is embellished for sure, but Braveheart wasn't even a name given to William Wallace. So they completely twisted everything.