Originally posted by grey fox
I seriously doubt this will be a good movie . It will encourage fanboyism and be a waste of time . Aren't the X-Men films already near enough focused on wolverine anyway ?
yeah so basically a Wolverine movie is X-men 4 minus the Xmen except Wolverine...if they do the weapon X stuff (pre-Xman Wolverine) I kinda hope it blow that way they'll make X4 and downplay Wolverine...he's been the focus in Xmen movies for too long it's time to let the other Xmen shine and to bring in knew mutant heros
Originally posted by Mainstream
yeah so basically a Wolverine movie is X-men 4 minus the Xmen except Wolverine...if they do the weapon X stuff (pre-Xman Wolverine) I kinda hope it blow that way they'll make X4 and downplay Wolverine...he's been the focus in Xmen movies for too long it's time to let the other Xmen shine and to bring in knew mutant heros
i agree %100 with you man just make a weapon x movie
Both X Men movies should have been titled Wolverine, since that's who seemed to be the main character in each movie. At least the third one will have both Angel and Beast, who should have been included from the beginning. My real concern is if the Wolverine movie does good they'll make him the focus of any future X Men movies too. Not everybody likes the guy. I'd rather see a Starjammers movie than sit through any more Wolverine movies.
Originally posted by Bushwacker
I'll second that, grey fox.
Thank-you , but to put it plainly Hugh Jackman's a jackass. His film's are never that good or only get good reviews because they connect with a good book and or tv series.......
From now on only Bruce Campbell can play wolverine , he could do the job and make the film worth watching
"Hail to the king"
-GF