The pecking order of the GDF and you.

Started by FeceMan6 pages

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Wow! The world - bar KMC - is his oyster! His power is almost absolute!

That indeed was the point I was trying to make. Keep your star for yourself--YOU are the big boy who figured it out all by himself.

Like Jesus before him, perhaps Ou Be Low hoo considers that the common man/woman/boy/girl/shit needs him the most...After all, you seem to be searching for him.

Look deep into your stool, FeceMan. Perhaps he is that indigestible piece of corn...Indestructable and perfect, yet willing to reside where others fear to tread.

Maybe you should start a cult or something. Then there could be religious persecutions and it would be all messy and zany and more people might wander down to the religion forum.

Re: The pecking order of the GDF and you.

Originally posted by KharmaDog
Where do you see yourself in the GDF pecking order?

Some people mistake popularity for infamy. Others see themselves as debaters extraordinaire even when they prove otherwise.

Do you see yourself as well liked? Intellectual? The sh*tdisturber? The funny guy?

I am just interested to see how people think they are viewed here, and how they believe they are presenting themselves.

You are living in an "illusion of the self". There is no need for ego, or to see yourself as something or someone. Self-identification creates conflict in the world.

Believing that what you're saying is true is also a form of egotism when it is at the expense of another person's line of questioning. Highlighting your difference of opinion is also a means to creating a form of self-identification. You are basically telling KharmaDog, "Look at me! What you are doing is wrong! I am right! Listen to what I say!".

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
Believing that what you're saying is true is also a form of egotism when it is at the expense of another person's line of questioning. Highlighting your difference of opinion is also a means to creating a form of self-identification. You are basically telling KharmaDog, "Look at me! What you are doing is wrong! I am right! Listen to what I say!".

You are right, to argue is also egotistical; that's why silence is golden.

Originally posted by Wonderer
You are right, to argue is also egotistical; that's why silence is golden.

Unless I voice an opinion in order to help other people...like a teacher that criticises in order to teach. What do you think?

What's wrong with Ego?

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
What's wrong with Ego?

It creates selfishness, because it promotes an importance of yourself above other people.

Originally posted by Wonderer
It creates selfishness, because it promotes an importance of yourself above other people.

It also promotes advancement and change - positives. Self is always going to be a driving force it's hard wired in and called the "Survival instinct", Debate forums are about putting you're point across and engaging in conflict with a small c, as a lawyer would in a court room. The best philosophers from Socrates to Bacon to Feynman had extremely large egos. This is not even a shadow of egos as great as that or debates as complex, but for good interesting debaters all sorts of egos large and small are needed. If people were nice to each other on here all the time I doubt most people would come on.

"I think, therefore I am" - Descartes

This kind of neutralizes the fundamentalist Buddhist belief in 'no self'.

We should save our little discussions for the philosophy forum, though...

Originally posted by Ya Krunk'd Floo
"I think, therefore I am" - Descartes

This kind of neutralizes the fundamentalist Buddhist belief in 'no self'.

We should save our little discussions for the philosophy forum, though...

agreed and good quote mate.

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
It also promotes advancement and change - positives. Self is always going to be a driving force it's hard wired in and called the "Survival instinct", Debate forums are about putting you're point across and engaging in conflict with a small c, as a lawyer would in a court room. The best philosophers from Socrates to Bacon to Feynman had extremely large egos. This is not even a shadow of egos as great as that or debates as complex, but for good interesting debaters all sorts of egos large and small are needed. If people were nice to each other on here all the time I doubt most people would come on.

Believe that if you want to suffer in life, my friend. The path to enlightenment (and I speak from experience) is selflessness and compassion. 🙂

Originally posted by Wonderer
Believe that if you want to suffer in life, my friend. The path to enlightenment (and I speak from experience) is selflessness and compassion. 🙂

Often conflict stems from altruism, often altruistic acts come from ego, look up "Jenner and Smallpox". 🙂

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
Often conflict stems from altruism, often altruistic acts come from ego, look up "Jenner and Smallpox". 🙂

The key is balance, not the extremes like ego and altruism, but in between - the golden middle way.

Peace brother. 🙂

Originally posted by Wonderer
You are right, to argue is also egotistical; that's why silence is golden.
Originally posted by Wonderer
Unless I voice an opinion in order to help other people...like a teacher that criticises in order to teach. What do you think?

I think you should take your own advice. Sit down, shut up, lead by example, and we'll see how many people follow you.

I know you are now a reformed Budhist, but I believe that the world is a big enough place that there are sometimes more than one answer to a single question. "How to be happy" or "How to lead your life" is one of those questions, and as a budhizt you cannot resolve that question for 6 billion people with one answer.

Because you believe it, does not make it right.

I've taken notice that there are some accusations going on in this thread. If you guys can't keep it civil it will be closed. So enough of this nonsense animosity. Drop it, now!

WD

Originally posted by WindDancer
I've taken notice that there are some accusations going on in this thread. If you guys can't keep it civil it will be closed. So enough of this nonsense animosity. Drop it, now!

WD

What happened to Batman WD?

Read the thread again mate it's very underscore good natured.

Ohhhh some people just like the debate of it all....you get the anal ones and the more layed back ones...

Originally posted by debbiejo
Ohhhh some people just like the debate of it all....you get the anal ones and the more layed back ones...

are you into "anal" ones Bebs? 😉 or do you prefer to lie back? 😉