Character Ownage

Started by Galan0075,121 pages

Originally posted by zopzop
Wow. Is this Prime Eternal Ikaris? Is this 616?
Yeah. It's from 'All-New Invaders' #4.

Originally posted by Galan007
Ikaris vs. Invaders:

__________

Awesome to see Ikaris getting so much respect.

Originally posted by carver9
I read his comics Pr. I know where he stands power wise. It's pretty clear what DC is trying to say about this guy.

Originally posted by Martian_mind
Awesome to see Ikaris getting so much respect.
Particularly this page:
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/18629918/All-New_Invaders_2014-_004-014.jpg.html

Ikaris="unbeatable" 🙂

Originally posted by Galan007
Particularly this page:
http://www.turboimagehost.com/p/18629918/All-New_Invaders_2014-_004-014.jpg.html

Ikaris="unbeatable" 🙂


Going up against Cap, Torch(Hammond), and Namor ain't all that impressive. Then again maybe I'm underselling him.
😮

none

He's totally unbeatable, breh. The comic said so. 👆

Superman was about to destroy the hemisphere by just standing.

Suffice to say Superman>>WWH.

👆

Originally posted by celeyhyga17
Going up against Cap, Torch(Hammond), and Namor ain't all that impressive. Then again maybe I'm underselling him.
😮

Seriously? Have you seen what Hammond is capable of? The fact that Ike survived his flames (apparently unfazed) is a monstrous durability feat.
Originally posted by Galan007
none

He's totally unbeatable, breh. The comic said so. 👆


They meant that team (Cap, Torch, Namor) couldn't beat Ikaris. Not that he's unbeatable by anyone.

I don't debate in the comic book enviroment, so I don't know the rules. But, since when did anyone give a shit about the narrations of an in-universe character?

It's a secondary source, and generally depends on the person saying it.

That Superman scan isn't really proof, unless there's another scan that backs it up.

Originally posted by -Pr-
It's a secondary source, and generally depends on the person saying it.

That Superman scan isn't really proof, unless there's another scan that backs it up.


He's cracking the ground in the very same scan.

srug

Originally posted by abhilegend
Superman was about to destroy the hemisphere by just standing.

Suffice to say Superman>>WWH.

👆

👆

WB Superman.

Originally posted by abhilegend
He's cracking the ground in the very same scan.

srug

The ground = an entire hemisphere now?

Originally posted by -Pr-
The ground = an entire hemisphere now?

Well, you can't destroy the hemisphere without breaking the ground can you? 😖hifty:

Originally posted by -Pr-
The ground = an entire hemisphere now?

Well, the writers have supplied the information through monologues of characters before. You have on panel proof that the damage was being done, the whole plot was revolving around it to the point superman was wearing a kryptonite ring and then the scope of damage was stated too. Why doubt it when everything adds up?

Originally posted by abhilegend
Superman was about to destroy the hemisphere by just standing.

Suffice to say Superman>>WWH.

👆

Huge reach. he's literally bursting through the ground in the same panel, clearly nowhere near a footstep while still holding back your power

And need I remind you how the same writer had Cho stating the same about unleashed WBH?

Originally posted by psycho gundam
Huge reach. he's literally bursting through the ground in the same panel, clearly nowhere near a footstep while still holding back your power

Sure thing bro.

Originally posted by abhilegend
Well, the writers have supplied the information through monologues of characters before. You have on panel proof that the damage was being done, the whole plot was revolving around it to the point superman was wearing a kryptonite ring and then the scope of damage was stated too. Why doubt it when everything adds up?

I asked if there was more to it than what Huntress said, and Superman crashing through the ground. Is there?

Originally posted by abhilegend
And need I remind you how the same writer had Cho stating the same about unleashed WBH?
you're going to think what you want, but it's not at all the same