Character Ownage

Originally posted by guy222

I don't see anything.

At least Galactus owned Rulk. That's all the consolation it seems I will be getting this days from Marvel 😖mart:

I think I'm going to stick tho WoK and the GotG for a few months.

Originally posted by guy222
Warning one is a lil gory

Christ ... who wrote that?

Guy? could you post Galactus owning Rulk???

marvel has offically gone retarted. i'm going back to DC

Originally posted by Bouboumaster
Marvel can **** off. 😐

****in' Galactus beaten by Beta Ray Bill and now THIS!?

When did BRB beat Galactus?

Originally posted by Endless Mike
When did BRB beat Galactus?

Originally posted by jalek moye
in his current series

I didn't know BRB had a current series

I will repost some scans. ImageHost is being a *****

I be honored to Utrigita 🙂

Originally posted by jalek moye
marvel has offically gone retarted. i'm going back to DC

We dont want you!

Originally posted by guy222
I be honored to Utrigita 🙂

👆 Thanks Mate 😄

Beta Ray Bill has a plan to destroy Big G.
That doesn't means he has to fight him. He will definitely fight SS, though.
His series, "Godhunter" aren't published yet...

Originally posted by guy222

This just made me quit reading comics all over again.

F#(k you Loeb!!!!!

The loeb suprised me because I didn't think he could write any worse. So now the Red Hulk absorbs powers but he decided not to do this with the hulk the first time why? Loeb has outdone himself, This is one of the dumbest comics I have read in a while.

Also with the doom issue I am interested in how it plays out (given the delays in ff it may not be any time soon) I reserve judgement only because (that could be a doom bot). There has to be a reason Doom is so completely out of character. I am giving Miller a little rope for this one.

hulk's gamma output/reserve will be stated to be too vast for rulk to drain when hulk gets mad and his abilities grow exponentially. i'm willing to bet on that.

What's with the "shorts" on Surfer?

Originally posted by Metalmanx
What's with the "shorts" on Surfer?

During his first two volumes the Surfer wore shorts, instead of being nude like he is now lol.

chalk it up to the sexual repression.

they had to put some shorts on the dude so that parents in the 60's wouldn't decide not to buy the comic for their children due to subliminal messages of sexuality, or in his case overt nudity.

So a huge silver guy in his underwear is a better book for children?

Alicia Masters says he's not huge at all.