Jango Fett versus Grievous

Originally posted by kamikz
Grievous can deflect blaster fire, when Obi shot him he didn't have any.

Pardon? And I hope your not going to not to say Obi-Wans a better shot than the most infamous 9and best) bounty hunter in the galaxy.

Well by what we saw in ATOC of Jango Fett's aim we can see that he could kill a Reek in a single shot in the middle of a battlefield after being trampled and having a Jedi Master, Mace Windu, not to far away to worry about.

Indeed. I'm not a terrible Jango fan by anyone's standards, but the sheer Grievous bias is absurd. People seem to think that only individuals with lightsabers can win battles.

I doubt Grievous could fight without eyes. Maybe without one eye, but yeah...

exanda kane, I'm through with you. Sorry, your fanboyism has become to much for me to comprehend with.

Originally posted by darthsith19 (Darth Maul Fanboy)
But it wouldn't matter. Even if he got shot in the eyes he wouldn't die. And if Jango has already used the missle he can't win so it's s stalemate.

exanda kane, I'm through with you. Sorry, your fanboyism has become to much for me to comprehend with.

lamo.

Look dude, I understand you must be feeling a little harsh after a few people came into the discussion and said that Jango will own Grievous, but you did ask for it with the swearing. Please dont swear again (even with an asterix).

Jango has a much bigger arsenal than Grievous, if he has no rocket's left after shooting Grievous in the eye (which may be going a bit far with his sniping ability), then he can use the rope to throw Grievous about, the flame thrower, his pistols or a few poison darts etc.

I feel people are getting a little carried away with Jango, because in all honesty, both fighters are equal, both being able to beat each other in different scenarios and both losing in others.