king kong vs hulk

why does that even matter when the hulk tossed a 60 ton tank a MILE away?

even if you want to say that Kong is close to the hulk in strength because he lifted a 30 ton animal with one hand youd be wrong. so what he lifted him and tossed him what thirty forty feet? one mile is 5280 feet. that means the hulk tossed a heavier object 132 TIMES farther. so kong using two hands would be able to toss the rex, at his very best maximum strength, maybe 70-80 feet. so thats still a hundred times less distance.

if you want to say that theres no proof the hulk tossed the tank a mile we can see that the tank disappeared from view so it had to be at least three or four blocks. thats still over a thousand feet, which is more powerful then anything king kong can ever possibly hope to do.

factor in that the more wounded he gets the BIGGER and STRONGER he gets and that his reflexes are quick enough to catch a rocket from out of the air and this is spite. the hulk would destroy kong. one punch would kill him for sure.

Originally posted by WO Polaski
why does that even matter when the hulk tossed a 60 ton tank a MILE away?

even if you want to say that Kong is close to the hulk in strength because he lifted a 30 ton animal with one hand youd be wrong. so what he lifted him and tossed him what thirty forty feet? one mile is 5280 feet. that means the hulk tossed a heavier object 132 TIMES farther. so kong using two hands would be able to toss the rex, at his very best maximum strength, maybe 70-80 feet. so thats still a hundred times less distance.

if you want to say that theres no proof the hulk tossed the tank a mile we can see that the tank disappeared from view so it had to be at least three or four blocks. thats still over a thousand feet, which is more powerful then anything king kong can ever possibly hope to do.

factor in that the more wounded he gets the BIGGER and STRONGER he gets and that his reflexes are quick enough to catch a rocket from out of the air and this is spite. the hulk would destroy kong. one punch would kill him for sure.

Originally posted by chomperx9
try doing some research 1st on the characters you post before posting. king kong was 25 feet tall and the tallest a T-rex can get in size is 35 ft. the ones in king kong werent fully grown yet. the one from jurassic park was an adult. the T-rex from journey to the center of the earth that is the biggest one.

Originally posted by iceman24567
The ones in King Kong weren't T-rex's they evolved from T- Rex's and their length were well above 35 feet how about you stop posting until you know what you are talking about.

Originally posted by chomperx9
even if they werent T-rexs in the king kong movie they made them look like whimps compared to the T-rex in jurassic park. i watched king kong last night and the parts where they where roaring at king kong did not sound ferocious or scary what so ever. the one from jurassic park was much more ferocious and deadly. if you have jurassic park 1 dvd toss it in and just skip to the part where T rex goes after the kids in the car.

Originally posted by darthgoober
Maybe they looked like comparative wimps because they had the chore of trying to take down Kong rather than just chase around a jeep like the T-Rex's...

Yeah thats nice your wrong though the Rex's in King Kong were physically more dangerous they had larger teeth they were bigger and they had physical rivals the Apes unlike the Rex's is Jurassic park they had no equal they had no predator after them. You just don't know what your talking about. I have both movies i watched bother at least 3 times so yeah your wrong.

Originally posted by chomperx9
talking about there size and how aggresive they sound. doesnt anyone have atleast 5.1 surround sound ? 🙁

And of course the T-Rex was more aggressive, he was the big fish in a small pond. The V-Rex's didn't have that luxury...

Originally posted by darthgoober
What makes you so sure the T-Rex was bigger? He didn't seem more than 3 or 4 times taller than the raptors at the end of the movie which would make him between 18 and 24 feat tall.

And of course the T-Rex was more aggressive, he was the big fish in a small pond. The V-Rex's didn't have that luxury...

Originally posted by iceman24567
Yeah thats nice your wrong though the Rex's in King Kong were physically more dangerous they had larger teeth they were bigger and they had physical rivals the Apes unlike the Rex's is Jurassic park they had no equal they had no predator after them. You just don't know what your talking about. I have both movies i watched bother at least 3 times so yeah your wrong.

and when they captured kong and brought him back to NY and jack black says the 25 foot gorilla theres your proof kong is 25 feet tall. and hes taller than the dinos that he fough if you look at the video where they fought. so sorry buddy but your dinos are shorter than 25 feet. and the T-rex from jurassic park was 35 feet tall. says on the description of a T-rex the average size is between 30-35 Ft tall.

Originally posted by chomperx9
sorry kong fanboy i have both movies as well. i have king kong on HD DVD and all 3 jurassic park movies on dvd. watched king kong last night yes one of the best movies of all time and kicks ass on HD dvd. but again the T-rexs didnt sound or look as scary as the one from jurassic park.

and when they captured kong and brought him back to NY and jack black says the 25 foot gorilla theres your proof kong is 25 feet tall. and hes taller than the dinos that he fough if you look at the video where they fought. so sorry buddy but your dinos are shorter than 25 feet. and the T-rex from jurassic park was 35 feet tall. says on the description of a T-rex the average size is between 30-35 Ft tall.

Originally posted by iceman24567
Length not height you genius 😐. The average T rex is about 40 feet long the V-Rex's were about 60-70 feet LONG big difference but continue to troll and deny solid proof and call me a fanboy even when your wrong. Ohh they didn't sound or look as scary omg no wai 😐

Why does it matter even if the last time i watched was 100 years ago your still wrong.

Originally posted by iceman24567
Why does it matter even if the last time i watched was 100 years ago your still wrong.

Look at the length difference it's not even up for debate to be honest the V-Rex's are almost 2 times as long as regular T-Rex's and no their mouths aren't bigger thats just a dumb statement. A T-rex's primary offensive weapons are their larger heads and mouths as they evolve isn't obvious that their head and mouths would grow too? Well maybe obvious to normal people...
http://godzilla.wikia.com/wiki/Vastatosaurus_Rex
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T_rex

Originally posted by iceman24567
Look at the length difference it's not even up for debate to be honest the V-Rex's are almost 2 times as long as regular T-Rex's and no thei mouths aren't bigger thats just a dumb statement. A T-rex's primary offensive weapons are their larger heads and mouths as they evolve isn't obvious that their head and mouths would grow too? Well maybe obvious to normal people...
http://godzilla.wikia.com/wiki/Vastatosaurus_Rex
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T_rex

You are aware that Rex's i mean all Rex's are hunch backed? Kong may be taller but legnth wise the V-Rex's are way longer nevermind your just an ignorant fella Ignored.

Originally posted by chomperx9
also says that they can go up to 25 MPH. in the dino index in jurassic park says the T-rex was capable of running up to 35 MPH

Originally posted by iceman24567
I wonder why that is? Maybe because they are alot bigger? Now your ignored.

Originally posted by darthgoober
TBH if the Gamma Dogs hurt Hulk with a bite, I could picture Kong biting him in half if the opportunity presented itself...

and the sheer size of their mouth would provide hulk ample leverage to
re-open it or block the upper and lower jaws from gripping him.

all hulk would have to do is disable it's mouth and the rex is useless.

and nothing could catch the hulk since he runs and jumps hundreds of miles per hour.