i just realized something about: SAW

Started by T.M2 pages
Originally posted by rox
in other words watch the first one again than watch the second one

I don't think i could sit though the 1st one again. I will wait to see the 2nd one on TV because i am not waisting money on buying or renting it.

Originally posted by Pandemoniac
'When you have that much poison running through your veins, all that's left to do is blow your brains out' (or something like that), is what Jigsaw told Gordon.

Gordon was to be under the assumption that the guy on the floor killed himself with the gun, instead of facing the agonising death by the poison. And of course, the guy's head was a mess, and he was laying in a puddle of blood. It was supposed to look like a suicide with a gun.
The info on the poison was only given to give Gordon the clue that he could kill Adam by dipping the smoke in the intoxicated blood. No doubt the (fake) blood was actually poisonous and he could have succeeded by following Jigsaws lead.

To wrap it up: that should still make Gordon go 'Hmm' when he finds the gun entirely empty.

If there was only one bullet in the gun, and the man on the floor used it to shoot himself in the head, then the gun would be empty.

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
If there was only one bullet in the gun, and the man on the floor used it to shoot himself in the head, then the gun would be empty.

yeah but unless its one of those bullets thats explodes on impact there should have been atleast a shell or even the bullet. and the blood was still moist and wet it should have been dried up

Originally posted by Adam_PoE
If there was only one bullet in the gun, and the man on the floor used it to shoot himself in the head, then the gun would be empty.

It was a revolver, the casings of the bullets remain in the cylinder of a revolver after firing.

Here's something I relized about Saw the first time I saw it - It sucked.

Originally posted by BackFire
Here's something I relized about Saw the first time I saw it - It sucked.

^Same here^

Originally posted by BackFire
Here's something I relized about Saw the first time I saw it - It sucked.

Yeah, I totally agree. Bad actors, bad effects. The second was waaay better.

Originally posted by LizzyT123
Yeah, I totally agree. Bad actors, bad effects. The second was waaay better.

YUP!

😉

I liked it, wasn't perfect but atleast something positively different among the mostly really sad 'horror'movies of the last few years

yeah, I somewhat agree with Pandemniac. It deffinetly was better than crappy new horror films like Boogeyman, or White Noise, or poo like that. But, I still think it could have been better. 🙂