Originally posted by Capt_Fantasticoh right! that does make sense in a way i suppose. but i can't see that ever happening as it'd probably discriminate against a potential candidate based on age.
I never said that Bush was better at/for anything. This isn't about Bush.And age limits are important because one has to consider the agendas of foreign groups and/or governments.
i was comparing the two as both being tragic..
Originally posted by Rave X
I havent read the whole thread, but I used to be a big Arnold fan, I love all his movies (I know he's a bad actor, but still) but since he became Bush II and voted against gay marriages, I truly cant stand him anymore... I really thought he would not be that shallow *disappointed*
Well he needs to be a good Republican. Best for his career.
Originally posted by Rave X
I havent read the whole thread, but I used to be a big Arnold fan, I love all his movies (I know he's a bad actor, but still) but since he became Bush II and voted against gay marriages, I truly cant stand him anymore... I really thought he would not be that shallow *disappointed*
I think there's a difference between a good actor and a good part. It's too bad that I agree. He's not always a bad actor, he just appears infilms that are an embarassment to him.