Maul vs. Bastila

Started by Sorgo12 pages
Originally posted by Tangible God
Is that a yes or no?

It's a "WTF!??!!"

How does Traya make a prediction of what's going to happen in 4000 years?

I've never played KOTOR 2, and by what I've heard from all her fanatical groupies around here, that is one feat she should have.

she did prodict the death of the Mandelorians... But no she did not prodict the Jedi in the future got weaker. She didn't put the Kotor Jedi in that list of very powerful Jedi either.

And generally being stronger also isn't that much of an argument, Bastila wins because of other reasons.

At the end of KOTOR 2, Traya makes some predictions...of course not all of what she says is right in the least. And she says the Ancient Empire is stronger than the current party....of course, those godly ancients were never shown as anything particularly special. So, logically...

Maul pwns Bastila, cause he's better with sabers.

Originally posted by calvin44
Maul pwns Bastila, cause he's better with sabers.

Hahaha! Show me some proof! Bastila killed loads of his kind.

What do you mean by "loads of his kind"?

Dark Jedi... Trained Assassins, shit like that.

Originally posted by Lightsnake
At the end of KOTOR 2, Traya makes some predictions...of course not all of what she says is right in the least. And she says the Ancient Empire is stronger than the current party....of course, those godly ancients were never shown as anything particularly special. So, logically...

You have never shown anything to prove that they aren't more powerful. All you came up with was that they shouldn't be allowed to have their amulets in a fight, even though it is part of their power.

It's not 'part of their power' any more than steroids would be. Weapons don;t do anything to enhance someone's force ability. In a sword fight, a sword is allowed. In a fight fight, fists are allowed. In a duel of one person's OWN POWER WITH NO ENHANCEMENTS GIVEN TO THAT POTENTIAL OR POWER, the equivalent of a steroid should not be used.

And how about this: Their entire attack force was wiped out by the command of four Jedi and on whiny kid.

What are we talking about now? Bastila vs Maul or Ancient Sith vs new Sith?

Originally posted by Lightsnake
It's not 'part of their power' any more than steroids would be. Weapons don;t do anything to enhance someone's force ability. In a sword fight, a sword is allowed. In a fight fight, fists are allowed. In a duel of one person's OWN POWER WITH NO ENHANCEMENTS GIVEN TO THAT POTENTIAL OR POWER, the equivalent of a steroid should not be used.

And how about this: Their entire attack force was wiped out by the command of four Jedi and on whiny kid.

It's not baseball. No one is going to stop them from jucin on up. They can take roids five, six times a day and no one will do anything about it. There is no rules on what they can or cannot use. If you won't accept that, then I suggest you find a new forum because thats just the way things are here.

I will take up as the new Kreia:

"My controversial prediction is.....this thread will go terribly awry within another 11 posts. These new posts would be like children with toys compared to those of old, since the posts of old were the strongest this thread has ever known."

God, I hate that b*tch.

Yes, Tangible is right.
Bastila'd take this after a probably hard won fight

Originally posted by Lightsnake
Yes, Tangible is right.
Bastila'd take this after a probably hard won fight

Maul is a better swordsman from what we can tell, and Bastila isn't using her battle med. It would also largely depend on the location of the duel.

maul would destroy bastila

Originally posted by fisto/katarnrul
maul would destroy bastila

Any proof?

If this is DS Bastila, then she takes the fight. LS Bastila would have more of a problem. Bastila is extremely reckless as a Jedi, I wouldnt put it past her to rush in and get Mauled. So, depending on Bastila's alignment, she would win easily (DS), or have a hard time, with may or may not end up in her death.

Originally posted by calvin44
Maul is a better swordsman from what we can tell, and Bastila isn't using her battle med. It would also largely depend on the location of the duel.

Form what we can tell? The Man was put down by a Padawan for christs sake! And don't try to tell me he was "Special" because I don't recall anyone saying he is Special or that *HE* was the chosen one.

Bastila has killed so many Dark Jedi and Sith, it isn't even FUNNY!

And I'm sure she didn't learn Battle Mediation so good because she is weak with the force.

Originally posted by Sorgo
Form what we can tell? The Man was put down by a Padawan for christs sake! And don't try to tell me he was "Special" because I don't recall anyone saying he is Special or that *HE* was the chosen one.

Bastila has killed so many Dark Jedi and Sith, it isn't even FUNNY!

And I'm sure she didn't learn Battle Mediation so good because she is weak with the force.


Do you know how many Jedi Maul killed? From what we have seen Bastila displays no great swordsman feats in KOTOR, which is(what i am aware of) the only knowledge that we have of her is from kotor. The reason she is a threat to Malak is the sole fact that She has an incredibly storng battle meditation. Maul was tired from facing Qui-Gon(who is not as weak as we all think), when Obi-wan finally got to face him. How many Dark jedi did Bastila kill? And dont tell me The ones in the Star Forge, becaus e the most-likely canon ending is the light-side ending, in which Bastila doesn't even accompany Revan for the events which took place during the final hours of the Star Forge.