Originally posted by melinda_warren
But we don't KNOW how to, we just do. Like a fish swims through water. (Be what we know true.) But my point is none of us learnt how to breathe. We just did. But you see, not even this is certain. Don't pass this off as nonsense you must just learn the truth, and there is no way any of us can show you something. You are too blind to see.
Originally posted by melinda_warren
And again i ask you, what is death?You are to blind to see what is right in front of you. If you want to open your eyes, you will. If you don't want to know right from wrong. Or in this case return from your ignorance, you will remain blind.
Originally posted by Slay
JC in Heaven.Here is a thirteen year old girl,telling me I'm too blind to see the truth.The truth is not in your philosophical ideas,which you create to seem interesting,or smarter than you actually are,the truth is what you make of it...which means,the truth is different to every human being or person...
Well, her philosophical ideas are quite clear and reasonable though. There are only probabilities...not certainties. We just choose to go by what seems to be most probable and call it "fact".
Originally posted by Slay
Which is a certainty.
No it's not. Its like a continous loop.
Until we can touch the sky it is not there. Until we can know the world it does not exist. Until we can read the words and understand them, they are not words at all.
If 'Nothing is certain' is a certainty, then it goes back on itself. A continous loop we find ourselves in until we know truth. If such a creature exists.
Originally posted by melinda_warren
And again i ask you, what is death?You are to blind to see what is right in front of you. If you want to open your eyes, you will. If you don't want to know right from wrong. Or in this case return from your ignorance, you will remain blind.
Why do we need to know everything? I know how to live life right.
Originally posted by melinda_warren\
i wonder if this is certain- 'Slay is a chicken'
Logically.
The volume of the universe is infinite, and it contains an infinite number of things.
Therefore, the universe must contain at least one thing that is Slay and is a chicken.
Since there can only be one Slay, and this thing is Slay, the only existing Slay must be a chicken, therefore Slay is a chicken.
Through the same logic, you can prove that he isn't, but it's funnier if he is. 😛
Originally posted by Lord Paradise
\Logically.
The volume of the universe is infinite, and it contains an infinite number of things.
Therefore, the universe must contain at least one thing that is Slay and is a chicken.
Since there can only be one Slay, and this thing is Slay, the only existing Slay must be a chicken, therefore Slay is a chicken.
Through the same logic, you can prove that he isn't, but it's funnier if he is. 😛
Oh by the way it is not certain if the Universe is infinite..there are quite some contradictory Theories on that.