Could Jack Nicholson play the Joker in the bb sequel?

Yeah I mean I'm not gonna be pissed if he didn't get it, I don't expect him to. I just think it'd be cool to see him, seeing as he has the best track record so far and is the coolest one yet. Supposedly when he does the voices, he gets real animated and makes the faces and whatnot.

Crispin Glover was born to play the part, ill be so happy if they select him. They cannot go wrong by choosing him.

Originally posted by NoFate007
Yeah I mean I'm not gonna be pissed if he didn't get it, I don't expect him to. I just think it'd be cool to see him, seeing as he has the best track record so far and is the coolest one yet. Supposedly when he does the voices, he gets real animated and makes the faces and whatnot.

Yeah, I've seen him do the voice acting, on some special features of a DVD, apparently he moves around alot, and he's the only one who stands up.
Sometimes they even send footage of him to the animators, so some of the stuff that the Joker does, Mark Hamil did first.

I haven't seen any of it. Is it good?

Maybe atkinson coul make a good Joker. I mean look at blackadeer 4. if u paint his face white, he would maybe even look like him. Maybe the one playing percy and darling could also pull it off. I mean a Joker with a british accent. that would be COOL.

To be honest, I didnt think Nicholson was great as the joker, to me he just lacked that manic edge I associate with the character.
Sure he electrocuted a guy to death and killed another with a pen, but those were part of the script, not characteristics of his performance and Nicholson made the character seem too forced and not free and manic enough.

The only reason I don't really like Crispin Glover being Joker is because he seems more like a creepy psycho, not much of a Joker-style psycho, you know? Cillian Murphy already gave us the best creepy psycho, lets have diversity amongst loonies!

i dont think cillian murphy was creepy at all...

if anyone watched jay and silent bob, mark hamill does the joker voice and 'acts' facially too. not very impressive though

Yeah but that was supposed to be ridiculous, not Joker-style. He was cocknocker lol.

Cillian was kinda freaky, but Joker shouldn't be freaky I think, in that way. Joker should be freaky in the sense that, since you're not taking part in it, you feel guilty that you think its funny, but if you were the one on the receiving end, you'd be freaked the hell out.

NO!!!

You need to kill off whatever the previous versions of batman left in our minds, you must not mix old with new. A new joke would be better.

Indeed a new joker should be better...I think Jack Nicholson wouldn't do it anyway altho he claims it was his favourite role, I think he realises that a new actor is needed for the new franchise.

Cillian Murphy was very creepy. You guys are nuts.

cillian WAS NOT creepy. he had no chance to be creepy. his voice was rendered as scarecrow and he had a mask on unless you call that creepy than sure

Originally posted by El_NINO
NO!!!

You need to kill off whatever the previous versions of batman left in our minds, you must not mix old with new. A new joke would be better.

Bingo.

Don't expect any of the old actors to make a reappearance. That's not the way it's gonna opearte, this time around. In fact, that was never the way that anything operated.

Originally posted by NoFate007
Nicholson was a good Joker but just because he was good doesn't mean someone can't be better. Look at James Bond. Connery was great, Dalton and Brosnan were better. If you really look at it, Nicholson was playing a lot of the same characters he's already played, with the tone of voice he used and such. The best person to portray The Joker so far has been Mark Hamill, but I highly doubt they will cast him in the sequel.

Thats the biggest lie ever.But I would expect to see you say that with the logic YOU have.LOL.Connery was the BEST Bond ever and Brosnan was the worst ever and this is coming from someone objective since Moore is my favorite Bond.Back to the topic at hand,No lets not have Nicholson in a nolan batman movie.Like keaton,he was horribly miscast in that role because of his physical build.Get someone that has the right build.so far Ceasar Romero has been the best Joker brought to life on the screen.

Originally posted by Mr Parker
Thats the biggest lie ever.But I would expect to see you say that with the logic YOU have.LOL.Connery was the BEST Bond ever and Brosnan was the worst ever and this is coming from someone objective since Moore is my favorite Bond.Back to the topic at hand,No lets not have Nicholson in a nolan batman movie.Like keaton,he was horribly miscast in that role because of his physical build.Get someone that has the right build.so far Ceasar Romero has been the best Joker brought to life on the screen.

Ha. Ok I'll accept that you think Connery was the best Bond, because he was a good Bond. I'll even accept that you like Moore the best, because its your opinion and opinions can't be wrong unless its something like "in my opinion murdering children for fun is a'ok". But don't start up this stupid crap about me not using logic again if you just disagree with me. I honestly won't be persuaded by methods like that.

No.. they need someone a bit younger and more creepier... and I agree Crispin Glover was born for this part... he better get it

cause if he dont , someone is gonna get shot.

I gotta see something Glover was in. He definitely does look the part, and from what I hear, he's incredibly messed up as it is, so he might even literally be born for this part lol. I gotta see him laugh and such, I haven't seen a single film he's been in (and I'm not gonna make it Charlie's Angels lol)

well you can always see him portrayed as MR. MCFLY!! but in all honesty your best bet is to watch the guy in charlies angels , he does some crazy laugh that could be passed off as the joker.