Re: Racist
Originally posted by redcaped
The truth is that we all are in a way. Black&Blond/Blond&Black/Asian&Black/Black&Asian. Being black is not bad just like spanikk or asian. Now, nobody has the right to tell us what we should like or not. We do have the right to choose what we like, even if our choice differs from our look. We can be racist as long as we respect the race. Why racist? Because we (some) cross the border of race which makes us racist but respectful human beings. So right here ladies and gentlemen we have the real meaning of the word "racist" which I prove not to be a menace. You are welcome to congratulate me positively. Also and my best part from this whatever (?)(your opinion): How would you qualify a law to prohibit-a-bit the blending of race? I mean a law that does not inter-fire between relationships, just the result of that. If this is 2 hot or 2 cold I will respect whatever you may bring, silence, agreement, disagreement, etc.
It's called selective breeding (aka Arianism [sp?]). It is both an abomination and an act against humanity because it strips the user from choosing his/her rightful counterpart in exsistance. This violation is seen as an act against the world of man and nature, which is punishable by the absense of life (aka death).
Originally posted by Bloigen
I don't think that's what Arianism means.
The "Aryan race" is a concept in European culture that was influential in the period of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It derives from the idea that speakers of the Indo-European languages constitute a distinctive "race". In its most notorious incarnation, under Nazism, it was argued that the earliest Aryans were identical to Nordic peoples. Belief in the superiority of the "Aryan race" is sometimes referred to as Aryanism. This should not be confused with the unrelated Christian religious belief known as Arianism