Originally posted by DARKLORDCAEDUS
Thing is though Spidey 3 is the biggest grossing Spiderman film. I've also realized that I could care less as to what a critic says. A lkot of critics didn't care for Spidey 3, that is their prerogative, but that didn't stop millions of people from seeing and loving it also. No will it stop Sony pictures from making many more.
millions saw it
doesnt mean at all that they loved it
Originally posted by DARKLORDCAEDUS
Thing is though Spidey 3 is the biggest grossing Spiderman film. I've also realized that I could care less as to what a critic says. A lkot of critics didn't care for Spidey 3, that is their prerogative, but that didn't stop millions of people from seeing and loving it also. No will it stop Sony pictures from making many more.
I was going to add that better worldwide success was inevitable due to the the first two movies, but I was too lazy. And not just the critics were saying bad things but many normal people were dissapointed as well, as they all had high standards for spiderman 3. I think alone spiderman 3 would have been accepted better, but because of 1 and 2 it wasn't, since 1 and 2 are clearly better movies. Had spiderman 3 been as good as 2 there is no doubt that it would be aiming at history in the domestic box office (maybe not titanic's 600 million- i don't know if anything will top that). spiderman 3 had a steep 60% decline from its opening week as it grossed 60 million compared to 151. If it was a better movie that the majority of the people liked, the decline would be nowhere near as steep due to word of mouth.
Originally posted by tooa/presence
I was going to add that better worldwide success was inevitable due to the the first two movies, but I was too lazy. And not just the critics were saying bad things but many normal people were dissapointed as well, as they all had high standards for spiderman 3. I think alone spiderman 3 would have been accepted better, but because of 1 and 2 it wasn't, since 1 and 2 are clearly better movies. Had spiderman 3 been as good as 2 there is no doubt that it would be aiming at history in the domestic box office (maybe not titanic's 600 million- i don't know if anything will top that). spiderman 3 had a steep 60% decline from its opening week as it grossed 60 million compared to 151. If it was a better movie that the majority of the people liked, the decline would be nowhere near as steep due to word of mouth.
You can bet your bottom dollar that those people that didn't liuke it most likely saw it again and again. I was not disappointed at all. Spidey 3 was what I fully expected.
Originally posted by DARKLORDCAEDUS
You can bet your bottom dollar that those people that didn't liuke it most likely saw it again and again. I was not disappointed at all. Spidey 3 was what I fully expected.
The only people that really didn't like the movie were true comic book nerds who can't stand to see a comic book movie unless it's EXACTLY like the comics.
"You can bet your bottom dollar that those people that didn't liuke it most likely saw it again and again. I was not disappointed at all. Spidey 3 was what I fully expected."
No or else it would have done a lot better in the domestic box office
"The only people that really didn't like the movie were true comic book nerds who can't stand to see a comic book movie unless it's EXACTLY like the comics."
Again no or else it definitely would have done better in the domestic box office especially since it opened on May 4th and not July 4th like spiderman 2 did.
And while there will alwaus be people that don't like a movie there are definetly a lot more people that didn't like spiderman 3. On the movie review aggregator site Rotten Tomatoes, Spider-Man 3 has a 61% critic rating from 207 reviews, with a 46% Cream of the Crop rating based on 39 reviews from major news outlets. The average user grade for spiderman 3 on yahoo is a B (that consists of over 60,000 normal people). COMPARE that to spiderman 2. Rotten Tomatoes calculated a rating of 93%, based on 228 reviews, with a "Cream of the Crop" rating of 95%, based on 39 reviews. The average user grade for spiderman 2 on yahoo is a B+ (that consists of over 133,800 normal people).
What the majority of the people seem to want is for the filmakers to dedicate the movie to one villain. That's the way I want it too. I loved spiderman 2 and doctor octopus. Although overall I liked Spiderman 3, people saw the villains fighting for screen time rather than getting to develop into the characters they should have. They really did cram too much into one movie. Hopefully the filmakers will learn from their mistakes.
i hope they recast the charetcers
harry charecter was the only good choice
tobey is short ,had no muscle in SM2&3;became fat , and looks nothing like a guy who shoudl be able to pull a smokin supermodel(lol...i meant MJ not ghostrider) which brings me to teh joint worst casting ever
kirsten dunst is UGLY!!!!!!!!(i'm sorry god),,,,, they should get
a charecter with more cleavage and who is by far better looking
Originally posted by ankur29
i hope they recast the charetcersharry charecter was the only good choice
tobey is short ,had no muscle in SM2&3;became fat , and looks nothing like a guy who shoudl be able to pull a smokin supermodel(lol...i meant MJ not ghostrider) which brings me to teh joint worst casting ever
kirsten dunst is UGLY!!!!!!!!(i'm sorry god),,,,, they should get
a charecter with more cleavage and who is by far better looking
I agree but peter parker isn't suppose to be a supermodel, he is a nerd after all. They should keep J.K. Simmons. he is hilarious
Originally posted by tooa/presence
I agree but peter parker isn't suppose to be a supermodel, he is a nerd after all. They should keep J.K. Simmons. he is hilarious
a nerd who hapens to pull fit girls , gwen,black cat,MJ etc
they shoudl also take a guy who can physically show he's a superhero , i'm not talkin arnold swrchzenggar level but like ryan reynolds level ,Tobey had flab rolls overlapping his side's when he was doing the stunts himslef!!!!!!!!!! 😘