Originally posted by Drache53
lol I believe she meant to wrap up the series completely. As in tie up all the loose ends and such. I think those words were used..But I do like your plan as well.
if they are wrapping up the series completely then why introduce brock and have venom?? its like an essay, why have a definition in the conclusion paragraph...'so ive been reading something and you tell me what it means at the end?'
id like either way, either wrap up, start again later, or keep going. They shouldve explored more of peter in the first movie like more of the pre spiderman then show how he learns those fancy moves...batman begins was awesome showing everything about batman, etc.
I think it could be 50/50
I think the success of Spidey 3 may determine it. You know what they're like, They always say they'll wrap all this pu on 3 or whatever, but sometimes theres alot more, how many Batman films are there??
Or they could take a long long break from spiderman and make them in a few years?
Ahh I dunno..
At the end of Spidey 2 it seemed like Harry would become the goblin since he found his dad's Goblin stuff and was hearing things/going crazy.
So now in Spidey 3 the villans will be Sandman and Venom. So what is Harry doing? So there must be a Spiderman 4 so Harry can become bad and fight Peter and then possibly be redeemed.