SilverSpider/Dizzle's Team Tournament:Second Round Drafts

Starfire BANNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally posted by thesilverspider
Starfire BANNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What why!

Originally posted by roughrider
Even at Class 90 strength, Captain Britain is still over Thing level caps, isn't he? Even if a little.

I think Thing is still stronger than him.... more durable too

Originally posted by dman2008
What why!

Originally posted by roughrider
Even at Class 90 strength, Captain Britain is still over Thing level caps, isn't he? Even if a little.

Nope.

Warpath is a class 90.

Britain is a class 90.

Thing is listed at class 85, but has feats in comic books placing him as a low level class 100.

Class 90 is fine.

Here's what Dizzle said:

Originally posted by Dizzle
This has been gone over. Thing has feats to support the fact that he is indeed a low level class 100 character, though bios say otherwise. He is slightly stronger than Iron Man, or their strength is close enough that it makes no difference either way. Iron Man is perfectly legal.

If you want to get really sneaky, Iron Man is listed by marveldirectory.com as a class 85 as well, if Thing's higher end feats don't satisfy you.

Originally posted by thesilverspider
Alot of reasons but mainly because she has a super-nova attack.

Originally posted by thesilverspider
Alot of reasons but mainly because she has a super-nova attack.

She does not have super nova attack 😠

She can fire star blasts but she does nothave a supernova attack

Originally posted by Scoobless
I think Thing is still stronger than him.... more durable too

Stronger? yup, Ben's stronger. More durable? Nope. Their possibly the same durability wise. Ben's slightly more durable. But can that tub of rock fly at the speed of sound? Nope.

Originally posted by dman2008
She does not have super nova attack 😠

She can fire star blasts but she does nothave a supernova attack

Originally posted by dman2008
Fine whatever I disagree with you But i'll pick someone else.

Here happy now http://www.titanstower.com/source/whoswho/starfire.html

Originally posted by Adam Warlock
Stronger? Perhaps. More durable? Maybe... But can that tub of rock fly at the speed of sound? Nope.

I think Scoob is helping you out Warlock 🙄

Originally posted by Adam Warlock
Stronger? Perhaps. More durable? Maybe... But can that tub of rock fly at the speed of sound? Nope.

why the hell would you argue with that assessment at all? i'm trying to help you out here

you've just stated that it's conceivable that Cpt Britain is over thing durability... and therefore over tourney limits

😑

Starfire is BANNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Fine can I have classic rouge ?

http://www.marveldirectory.com/individuals/r/rogue.htm

Originally posted by dman2008
Fine can I have classic rouge ?

http://www.marveldirectory.com/individuals/r/rogue.htm

only if you spell her name right 😛

but power draining is banned as far as i know

Originally posted by dman2008
Fine can I have classic rouge ?

http://www.marveldirectory.com/individuals/r/rogue.htm

does Captain Britain have any energy blasts? i didn't notice them mentioned in his bio

Originally posted by thesilverspider
not sure since she does brake the ohko rule.

Well can have her If I don't use her to steal anyones abilities the way she does nad just use her sppee durability and strength i think thats reasonable.

Originally posted by Scoobless
why the hell would you argue with that assessment at all? i'm trying to help you out here

you've just stated that it's conceivable that Cpt Britain is over thing durability... and therefore over tourney limits

😑

Ok what I meant to say was

1. Thing is stronger than Britain.

2. Thing's durability slightly higher or is on par with Britain

3. The reason why I didn't choose Thing is because he can't fly and move at high speeds.

You guys misunderstood.

Originally posted by dman2008
Well can have her If I don't use her to steal anyones abilities the way she does nad just use her sppee durability and strength i think thats reasonable.