I don't think this guy is a perv!!!!

Started by PVS3 pages

i didnt catch that last line. wow thats odd 😖

Originally posted by PVS
i didnt catch that last line. wow thats odd 😖

No probs.

Originally posted by PVS
i didnt catch that last line. wow thats odd 😖

Me neither...he edited after I read it. But I assumed it was at least a real relationship not a "rape" kind of thing.

Originally posted by Bardock42
Me neither...he edited after I read it. But I assumed it was at least a real relationship not a "rape" kind of thing.

I did he married her it's on the TV news here, I felt it needed to be added I expect PVS did the same as you. Sorry guys!

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
I did he married her it's on the TV news here, I felt it needed to be added I expect PVS did the same as you. Sorry guys!

No problem. Suits my arguement.

Wow, I'm actually torn on this topic. I'm not sure if I need to say that the guy is a danger to children, and deserves what he got, or if he needs to be given a break.

I guess my opinion on this is that he did get into a relationship with an underage person. I don't know if that should be accepted and forgiven, despite him marrying her or not.

Maybe someone should address why he got into a relationship with an underage person, despite the outcome.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Wow, I'm actually torn on this topic. I'm not sure if I need to say that the guy is a danger to children, and deserves what he got, or if he needs to be given a break.

I guess my opinion on this is that he did get into a relationship with an underage person. I don't know if that should be accepted and forgiven, despite him marrying her or not.

Maybe someone should address [B]why he got into a relationship with an underage person, despite the outcome. [/B]

Well it seems to have been in love since they married...it was mutual...she was already 15...don't see the big problem actually.

I believe you can't control who you fall in Love with, but Bardock, you don't believe in Love like me 😉

Well, what I'm saying is this: Did he get involved with her because she was 15 and it was that fact that drew hi to her, or was it because of her? Granted, that's a question that only the man himself can answer. But, it would be the deciding factor in my opinion of the situation. But, I'm just one person, and if the consensus of the parents in his situation are okay with him being around their kids, then I guess it's okay. Not to sound arrogant.

Originally posted by Sir Whirlysplat
I believe you can't control who you fall in Love with, but Bardock, you don't believe in Love like me 😉

I don't know in what yu believe so well...but indeed you can not really control it in my opinion either...maybe slightly.

Can I just remind people that this person has never been convicted of any crime?

He received a caution.

If he had been actually convicted of a sexual offence, it is much less likely that the Government would have actively promoted to schools that he was no threat to kids.

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Can I just remind people that this person has never been convicted of any crime?

He received a caution.

Yup!

Originally posted by Ushgarak
Can I just remind people that this person has never been convicted of any crime?

He received a caution.

Thanks for reminding..but I don't think it's the point of the thread actually.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Not to sound arrogant.

CF 😖hifty: never! 🙂

PVS said earlier that we don't know if he received a mild sentence for a more serious crime.

I am reminding people that it is absolutely definite that nothing in the area of 'serious crime' has ever been proven against him, and as we all know, he's innocent until something proves otherwise.

You do not get cautions for serious offences.

my bad...."legal action"

there's no such thing as cautions here. you are found guilty of a crime or you walk and your record is clean

Originally posted by Ushgarak
PVS said earlier that we don't know if he received a mild sentence for a more serious crime.

I am reminding people that it is absolutely definite that nothing in the area of 'serious crime' has ever been proven against him, and as we all know, he's innocent until something proves otherwise.

You do not get cautions for serious offences.

Yes, that'S true.

Originally posted by Capt_Fantastic
Well, what I'm saying is this: Did he get involved with her because she was 15 and it was that fact that drew hi to her, or was it because of her? Granted, that's a question that only the man himself can answer. But, it would be the deciding factor in my opinion of the situation. But, I'm just one person, and if the consensus of the parents in his situation are okay with him being around their kids, then I guess it's okay. Not to sound arrogant.

Well to stay with her for around 26 years afterwards (And I am pretty much sure that she wasn't fifteen for at least 18 of them) shows kind of that it was for her...well maybe it was part of a greater sheme to get close to 15 year olds again..but it might just not.

Well it's just how our society thinks, there are other societies that marry that age and younger....Even historically, people used to marry someone much younger.

Originally posted by debbiejo
Well it's just how our society thinks, there are other societies that marry that age and younger....Even historically, people used to marry someone much younger.

thank you for this really important and not known fact debbie.

Originally posted by Bardock42
thank you for this really important and not known fact debbie.
No prob. 😉