Sith Lords

Where did they come from? movie does not talk about the sith lords. Can someone give more info?
I think Darth Maul is the best sith lord ever.

Well you'll have to repost this (or it will be moved) into the EU forum. In the movies there is no mention of any of this. So in canon, there is no real history of the Sith.

and Darth Sidious is the best Sith lord ever 😛

I'll tell you in quick way so this topic can be closed

In the beginning there were only Jedi. But some Jedi left the Jedi order because they were more interestedi in the Dark Side...they became fugitives and ended up on an unmapped world where they were worshipped as gods by a primitive race called the Sith...they heired that name. They used the Sith to built temples, the Sith race were slaves under the rule of the Dark Jedi which later became the Sith themselves
The title Darth comes from a Sith called Darth Bane who created a new Sith order with a new rule "there can only be two" cause the Sith in their history were also known for destroying each other. From his name the title "Darth" came which is based on Julius Ceasar...cause the roman emperors used his name as a title too.

That's an EU explanation.

What we know from GL is that the Sith started out thousands of years ago, and once ruled most of the Galaxy, before turning against each other. Their actual origin is left unclear; GL's words might be taken to mean that the Jedi predate the Sith but also they may not.

GL does not seem to consider the possibility of the Sith ever having been a race, any more than there was ever a race called 'Jedi'. It's just a name.

Frankly I like the EU version better.

I like the EU explanation better as well to be perfectly honest. What I don't like is the fact that EU makes these "ancient Sith" so powerful its just stupid.

But in Canon, the Sith were just Jedi who embraced the Darkside thousands of years ago and called themselves the Sith.

OK, then.

I like EU which doesn't mess with the movies...I saw a comic where nobody knew how Jabba looked like, and the comic makers decided to make him a skinny, ape looking alien. That is totally wrong of course!
Owen Lars was once Obi-Wan's brother...they changed that now, but they didn't delete the story....now it's just a brother called Owen...which he almost forgot because of his training. I don't mind about all that! I think it's cool how they present the clone wars in comics and especially the clone wars animated serie! Now those are canon in my opinion.

The EU version is more confusing for some.

Hehe, I remember that. They called him Jabba the Hut, right? With one T?

Could be...The EU version is just larger and a more detailed explenation...I consider it canon, altho you don't hear from it in the movies...Like I said if it doesn't mess with the movies...I don't care. Then I even like it! But all old comics of marvel are not canon IMO. They just did what they thought would be cool and didn't care about the rest...Now Dark Horse looks at other facts so that what they write doesn't get in conflict with the movies...Not all is accurate tho. For example. For a long time after the battle of Geonosis Anakin uses a lightsaber that looks the same as the one from ep II which got destroyed...I don't think he built an exact same, but built the one which Luke got right after the battle of Geonosis...makes more sense. And in one comic he has his short padawan hair while in the other he has his long hair from ep III...they should have tried to make an evolution. Same with Obi-Wan and other that changed. Stories could also tell more about Padmé...what she did during the Clone Wars.

Yup. And the first Sith lord Was Naga Sadow (Correct me if I'm wrong. But I do remember it being Naga)

True but it was Xendor's successors who conquered the Sith becoming the Sith Lords. Xendor was never a Sith...He was known as the first Dark Jedi.
One of the first known Sith Lords is Ajunta Pall

I read something that tells you like the entire history of the Sith. No SuperShadowing or anything, everything in it is reasonable. No "Darth Scarz."

Originally posted by Faroth
Yup. And the first Sith lord Was Naga Sadow (Correct me if I'm wrong. But I do remember it being Naga)

look this up on wookiepedia, posting it on any forum would take up like, three pages.

It doesn;t matter what you 'consider' canon. It is NOT canon. I invite you to read the thread noted at the top of the page that explains board policy in this respect.

Originally posted by Darth Jello
look this up on wookiepedia, posting it on any forum would take up like, three pages.

Wookiepedia? Does that even exist? A SW Wikipedia... Imagine that!

Naga Sadow was not the first Lord of the Sith. He came after Markus Ragnos and fought with Ludo Kreesh for the mantel of the Dark Lord. Ajunta Pall was the first dark lord

All the sith lords came from one rouge jedi who then trssined many other rouge jedi in the ways of the darkside since he thought it was more powerful. But that is eu and i might e wrong on some of the info.

EXAR KUN WAS THE BEST!