Prove Evolution...win money

Started by Atlantis00125 pages

Originally posted by sithsaber408
Your points are.....

You prove the Dr. wrong by.....

"God scares me. He cant be real."

"It just evolved, so there."

"It was a cosmical mix of.....damn. I don't know WHO, HOW, WHY, WHERE, or WHAT could have caused the big bang."

"Evolution/the big bang feels better than God. At least I can live my sh*tty life the way I want to."

Or did I miss a genuine scientific explanation. 😉

I agree with the doctor. Convert me to evolutionism if its true.

I've seen people healed of disease (my father-in-law, mother), drug addiction(myself), and physical disablility (in my church), by the power of God, given to them through faith in Jesus Christ. 🙂

I'll take what I can see over the BS reasons of evolution that Darwin himself says is folly....(as I posted earlier)

"To suppose that the human eye could have been formed by natural selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest degree."-CD 😎

This conflict between God vs evolution is not real. The concept of God does not conflict with any scientific theory like the evolution or the Big Bang. Sincerely this is more a conflict between bible vs science, not even religion vs science. This is a matter of forcing christian beliefs into people, it does not concern God, it only concerns the acceptance of evolution that so many people have today, and which violates the dogmas of the church. Perhaps the church just feel offended with so many people believing in things which are not in the bible, like evolution.

Originally posted by Atlantis001
Perhaps the church just feel offended with so many people believing in things which are not in the bible, like evolution.
I think you hit it right on the nose.

Those arguments are not about evolution itself, their arguments are valid since they concern their area of study. The statistician said in other words that something so complex as the human body with all its functions is extremely improbable, which is statistics

I don't think so. It would be helpful if we had something other than a single quotation, but just because a statistician makes a comment that involves probability, it doesn't necessarilly make it a valid authority. If you're going to talk about probability theory as it relates to biology, you need to understand biology as well as probability--and George Gallup, a fundamentalst Christian who's specialty was in polling procedures, didn't. (Gallup was so fundamentalist, in fact, that he was once caught falsifying survey that showed a decline in Christianity's popularity; a nice objective source for Creationists to quote!)

As for Hawkings, I did mention that he was talking about the anthropic principle.

if i prove that the majority of his questions are opinion based and not purely factual (what defines "perfect"😉, will he give me head in addition to the money?

I'm only commenting here to wonder how big a can of worms the original poster just opened.

Prove god...

Actually, no reward. It can't be proven.

Originally posted by Darth Jello
if i prove that the majority of his questions are opinion based and not purely factual (what defines "perfect"😉, will he give me head in addition to the money?

Head in addition to money? I'm pretty sure that would violate his religion in some way.

hey, "cradle the balls, work the shaft" sounds like a holy ritual.

and for some it is

😂

It must be coffee time alllll ready!......I need more coffee...

My personal view is that God created all the rules in the universe.. Atoms and the space in which they confided.. Then left it all up to chance...

On a side note I couldn't help noticing the tital.... and thought...
"Make up a religion.... Earn money" - scientology

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
My personal view is that God created all the rules in the universe.. Atoms and the space in which they confided.. Then left it all up to chance...
I don't believe it's really chance though...Things can be manipulated... ✅

There still the question "Does life begun with the first cell or it already existed before ?"

Well before the cells would be the essence or thought of life which could be said to be alive. Things invisible to us...Just as you can cut a part of a leaf off and photograph it with special equipment and it would still show the leaf as whole. Though we see the leaf as cut. There is still something there to be photographed.

Originally posted by Atlantis001
There still the question "Does life begun with the first cell or it already existed before ?"

The string of life does not work if at any point death occurs.

The answer to every question is in this 125 page thread. Feel free to search it.

http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=27866&highlight=evolution

Prove Evolution...win money

What's this--a game show??

Prove something already proven? And win money?
What's the catch?

Originally posted by debbiejo
I don't believe it's really chance though...Things can be manipulated... ✅

Well... with the current set of rules theres only soo many events that could happen... think of it this way... God creates a coin... He then flips it.. knowing that its going to be heads or tails.. (the coin has a rounded edge so it can never land on its edge..) with that he knows that either way the results are ok for him...

Unless you mean that God actually has an influence on us today... In which case I would like to ask for examples... (Not people getting incredibly lucky...)

Originally posted by Hit_and_Miss
Well... with the current set of rules theres only soo many events that could happen... think of it this way... God creates a coin... He then flips it.. knowing that its going to be heads or tails.. (the coin has a rounded edge so it can never land on its edge..) with that he knows that either way the results are ok for him...

Unless you mean that God actually has an influence on us today... In which case I would like to ask for examples... (Not people getting incredibly lucky...)

It's like with science, ie quantum physics....things we don't really understand as a people can't be seen, studies grouped with other older sciences such as metaphysics....There are ties with in the groups...It's an older view but maybe they are on to something. I only say that because of interments that have determined and that there is something different from what is preconceived. And why not?.....The purpose of science is to see and prove and document....Which is being done.

Regarding chance, let's try this...

There is another thread which basically involves the question: Is there something God can't do? In other words, does God have limits? The obvious answer is: of course! If "God" did not include limits, then "limits" would be something outside of God. And since "God" (or whatever word you wanna use) is All There Is, by definition there can be nothing "outside of God."

Same thing with "chance." God includes chance, otherwise "chance" would be "outside of God," and Nothing is outside of God.

Naturally, you can define God as something smaller, less than infinite, in which case things can exist outside of God/Infinity. To each his own. Personally, I like my God rather ultimate and absolute...but hey, that's me. Many colors make a rainbow.
😄