2 Mauls who are exactly the same vs. Mace Windu (RotS) The setting is in the room where Qui-Gon and Obi fought Maul. I personally think that Windu has this, but I want to hear what other people think.
DC
DE CalvinKommunist
WTF?
PUR
PurpleSaberVaapad Master
Yeah it's weird but just try and imagine that there are 2 mauls. Take it seriously.
DC
DE CalvinKommunist
The two mauls barely win...assuming this is pre-ROTS Mace.
PUR
PurpleSaberVaapad Master
It is RotS Mace.
DC
DE CalvinKommunist
They Still win.
PUR
PurpleSaberVaapad Master
The four blades would be pretty overwhelming, but I still say Mace.
DC
DE CalvinKommunist
Because if Mace is allowed to get an extra 15 years of exp. so do the 2 Mauls.
PUR
PurpleSaberVaapad Master
They are TPM Mauls and it is RotS Mace.
DC
DE CalvinKommunist
Thats stupid...You are just handicapping it enough to the point that Mace wins.
PUR
PurpleSaberVaapad Master
It still is pretty fair even if they are TPM mauls. Maul is still pretty skilled for an aprentice back then and he has the advantage of double bladed sabers. Mace is just a better swordsman.
DC
DE CalvinKommunist
You will keep changing the setting and circumstances though until Mace wins.
PUR
PurpleSaberVaapad Master
I haven't changed anything. In my first post I said RotS Mace and 2 Mauls. It should be assumed that the Mauls are TPM Mauls because that is the only movie where he is alive. I didn't change any circumstances or settings.
DC
DE CalvinKommunist
It should be TPM Mace.
PUR
PurpleSaberVaapad Master
Just tell me who you think would win and why under the circumstances I have set.
DC
DE CalvinKommunist
The Mauls. Grievous had 4 blades, wasn't force-sensitive, and almost beat Kenobi, therefore ROTS Kenobi being close to ROTS Mace, almost losing to Grievous, would make it probable that 2 mforce-using Sith, would Defeat Mace.
PUR
PurpleSaberVaapad Master
GG didn't almost beat Kenobi. Kenobi won fair and square. And I'd say that Mace is quite a bit better than Kenobi.
CR
Captain REXNetworking
Calvin, we don't even see Mace fight in TPM, so how can you be arguing that it should be him?
Besides, you don't argue the parameters of the fight; you argue why one person wins or loses.
Trump.
NUM
NumanRestricted
Originally posted by DE Calvin The Mauls. Grievous had 4 blades, wasn't force-sensitive, and almost beat Kenobi, therefore ROTS Kenobi being close to ROTS Mace, almost losing to Grievous, would make it probable that 2 mforce-using Sith, would Defeat Mace.
That is completely illogical.
FIS
FishySenior Member
I have to agree with Numan there...
Mace wins, it doesn't matter what Mace.. TPM Maul even if there were 2 would not be able to stand a chance against the Vaapad master, besides Maul probably wouldn't work very well with Maul.